In the work of the next 50 years the idea of sound change was made more precise, and, in the 1870s, a group of scholars known collectively as the Junggrammatiker ("young grammarians," or Neogrammarians) put forward the thesis that all changes in the sound system of a language as it developed through time were subject to the operation of regular sound laws.
The estimate was made more precise using a technique known as electron spin resonance spectoscopy.
Subsequently this value was made more precise by computational approximation.
Based on the discussions, the description of each code was made more precise and examples were added to the coding system.
Minor changes were made on one measure of risk perception (the comparator "perceived relativesusceptibility relative to others" was made more precise by specifying age and gender at S11) and two new items (current worry and infectivity relative to seasonal flu) were added in later surveys to refine measurement and during the surveys.
But perhaps once one considers the GTT explicitly, accepts the underdetermination of 'case' and considers a few of the ways it can be made more precise to get different logics, it just seems clear that there will be several alternative ways to make it more specific, with none singled out as more correct than the others by current usage.
But as for the first paragraph, we think that it could be made more precise.
As stated above, I don't think the impact of the paper relies on this conclusion and it could be made more precise without loss of significance.
Since things may be neither numerically the same nor numerically different, the question "How many things are there?" is ill-formed as it stands and must be made more precise, a fact Abelard exploits in his discussion of the Trinity.
Since the corresponding languages are interpreted by the translation Tr into ordinary English, this is a claim about the logicality of certain axioms and inferences rules of ordinary English.[11] Even before the Logicality Thesis is made more precise, it is possible to assess its plausibility for at least some of the axioms and inference rules of PFO and PFO+.
It is a general principle that test statistics can be made more precise, with gain of statistical power, by conditioning on ancillary statistics (Cox and Hinkley, 1974).
