it was latter

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was latter" is not correct in written English.
The correct term is "it was later," which is used to refer to a time that comes after a specified point in time. Example: "I thought the meeting was at 2 PM, but it was later than I expected."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The match is so bad-tempered it was latter dubbed the 'Battle of Nuremberg'.

BBC

It was latter recognized that a very similar picture could be produced by a variety of other illnesses & injuries which did not include major nerve injury [ 2].

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Supernatural or super natural?" I ask, hoping that it's latter.

Vice

It was the latter.

The New York Times - Magazine

It was the latter.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Obviously it was the latter.

The New York Times

But above all it was the latter.

Independent

I firmly believe it was the latter.

The New Yorker

Schmidt would argue it was the latter.

The Guardian - Sport

Lucky day, it was the latter.

The New Yorker

"I must admit it was the latter".

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "it was latter" in formal writing. Instead, use "it was later", "subsequently", or "afterward" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "latter" when they mean "later". "Latter" refers to the second of two things mentioned, while "later" refers to a time after the present or after a stated time. Ensure you're using the correct word based on your intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was latter" is grammatically incorrect. The intended function is to indicate a sequence in time, but the use of "latter" instead of "later" makes the phrase nonsensical. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as incorrect.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "it was latter" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. The correct phrasing to indicate a subsequent time is "it was later". As Ludwig AI points out, the term "latter" refers to the second of two items, not a point in time. While the phrase appears rarely in sources like BBC and BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, it is not considered standard English. Using alternatives such as "it was subsequently" or "it was afterward" will ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was later

Replaces "latter" with the correct adverb "later", indicating a point in time after the previous one.

it subsequently was

Uses "subsequently" to indicate that something followed after something else.

it was afterward

Replaces "latter" with "afterward" to denote a later time or event.

it was then

Indicates that something happened at a specific point in time following a previous event.

it transpired later

Employs "transpired" to suggest that something became known or proved to be the case at a later time.

it turned out to be

Indicates that something eventually became clear or happened in a particular way.

it became clear later

Uses 'became clear' to indicate a fact that was revealed in time.

it was revealed afterward

Uses 'revealed' to show a fact that has been unveiled in time.

it was understood subsequently

Uses 'understood' to introduce a fact that has been grasped in time.

in retrospect, it was

Adds 'in retrospect' to refer to something that has been thought in time.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "it was latter"?

The grammatically correct way to express that something happened at a subsequent time is to say "it was "it was later"". The word "latter" refers to the second of two items, not a point in time.

When should I use "latter" versus "later"?

"Latter" refers to the second of two things that have been mentioned. For example, "I prefer tea to coffee; the latter is too strong for me." "Later" indicates a time that follows. For example, "I will call you "later"".

What are some alternatives to saying "it was latter"?

Instead of "it was latter", you can use phrases like "it was subsequently", "it was afterward", or "it was then" to indicate that something happened at a later time.

Is "it was latter" ever correct in a sentence?

No, "it was latter" is not grammatically correct. The correct usage would involve "the latter" when referring to the second of two items previously mentioned, but not in the context of time.