it was invalidated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was invalidated" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been rendered void or no longer valid, such as a contract, agreement, or decision. Example: "The contract was signed, but it was invalidated due to a breach of terms."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The NRA ended when it was invalidated by the Supreme Court in 1935, but many of its provisions were included in subsequent legislation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In 2000, it was invalidated by the United States Supreme Court after a challenge from several political parties.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Texas senator Ted Cruz added: "The president's lawless and radical attempt to destabilise the nation's energy system is flatly unconstitutional and – unless it is invalidated by Congress, struck down by the courts, or rescinded by the next administration – will cause Americans' electricity costs to skyrocket at a time when we can least afford it".

The Guardian

"I was concerned with what would follow if it were invalidated, that it would open the doors to enact aggressive voting suppression measures.

Huffington Post

But just because we can't explain grief doesn't mean it's invalidated, Kaplan says — and that especially goes for grieving a celebrity.

Huffington Post

As it turned out, the election was invalidated for reasons unrelated to Local 958.

The New York Times

Their reliance on such statements leads to a peculiar and unsettling possibility: that an identical order would be upheld if Barack Obama had issued it, but that this one was invalidated because Trump was the author.

The New Yorker

"Today my illness was invalidated, but it doesn't make my illness any less real or my fight any less important," McGovern wrote in the post accompanying the photo above.

Huffington Post

Opponents of the law are also suing to overturn it, claiming it should be invalidated because as it was coming up for a vote in the Legislature, several lawmakers placed small bets as to what the margin would be.

The New York Times

They won a modified order that was invalidated on appeal.

The New York Times

The state's death penalty statute was invalidated in 2004.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was invalidated", ensure the context clearly indicates what 'it' refers to. This avoids ambiguity and maintains clarity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "it was invalidated" excessively, as it can make your writing sound indirect and less engaging. Consider using an active voice construction when appropriate, such as "the court invalidated it" or "they invalidated it".

Linguistic Context

It was invalidated functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something (represented by 'it') has been rendered void or without legal force. As Ludwig AI states, it is a valid and correct English phrase. This construction is used to emphasize the action performed on 'it' rather than the actor performing the action.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was invalidated" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that something has been officially declared not valid. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English and is especially relevant in contexts such as news, encyclopedias, and science, where formal and objective language is preferred. While the phrase is correct, it appears relatively rarely in common usage. Alternatives like "it was nullified" or "it was voided" may be used depending on the specific nuance required. When using this phrase, be mindful of the context and ensure that the referent of 'it' is clear.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was deemed invalid

Rephrases "it was invalidated" to include 'deemed invalid', emphasizing that an official judgment declared its invalidity.

it was ruled invalid

Rephrases "it was invalidated" to include 'ruled invalid', highlighting that a legal or authoritative entity made the determination of invalidity.

it was nullified

Replaces 'invalidated' with 'nullified', implying a complete and utter cancellation or negation.

it was voided

Substitutes 'invalidated' with 'voided', suggesting that it was emptied of legal effect.

it was overturned

Uses 'overturned' instead of 'invalidated', indicating a reversal of a decision or result, often by a higher authority.

it was rescinded

Replaces 'invalidated' with 'rescinded', indicating a formal withdrawal or cancellation.

it was revoked

Substitutes 'invalidated' with 'revoked', implying that it was officially taken back or canceled, often a license or privilege.

it was repealed

Uses 'repealed' instead of 'invalidated', indicating the official cancellation of a law or statute.

it was abolished

Replaces 'invalidated' with 'abolished', suggesting a complete end to something, often a system or practice.

it was quashed

Substitutes 'invalidated' with 'quashed', implying that something was suppressed or rejected, often a legal action.

FAQs

What does "it was invalidated" mean?

The phrase "it was invalidated" means that something has been officially declared not valid, or that its legal force has been canceled. It suggests that an entity or process once considered acceptable or legitimate is no longer so.

What can I say instead of "it was invalidated"?

You can use alternatives like "it was nullified", "it was voided", or "it was overturned" depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "it was invalidated"?

It's appropriate to use "it was invalidated" when you want to emphasize that a formal process or decision rendered something no longer valid. This is commonly used in legal, political, or formal contexts.

Is there a difference between "it was invalidated" and "it was rejected"?

Yes, while both imply that something is not accepted, "it was invalidated" suggests a formal declaration of invalidity, usually by an authority or legal process. "It was rejected" simply means that something was not accepted, without necessarily involving a formal invalidation.