it was funded

USAGE SUMMARY

"it was funded" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that received funding or financial support, such as a project or activity. For example: "The new community center was funded by donations from local businesses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It was funded by subscription and had its own marked crockery.

Wikipedia

First, it was funded privately.

The New York Times

It was funded by British-Jewish interests.

Yale University

It was funded by the film industry.

The Guardian

It was funded by the C.I.A.

The New Yorker

It was funded for three years.

Nature

It was funded by the government-in-exile.

Stanford University

It was funded by the National Science Foundation.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

It was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

University of California, Berkeley

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

It was funding in euros and swapping into U.S. dollars.

Forbes

How will it be funded?

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was funded", clearly state the source of the funding to provide context and transparency. For example, "The research project was funded by the National Science Foundation."

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clarifying who provided the funding. Instead of saying just "It was funded", specify the funding source to avoid confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was funded" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject (e.g., a project, organization, or initiative) received financial support from an external source. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Academia

28%

Science

23%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "it was funded" is a versatile and common way to indicate that something received financial support. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various fields, including news, academia, and science. When using "it was funded", it's best practice to specify the source of the funding to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "it received funding" and "it was financed" exist, "it was funded" remains a straightforward and effective option for conveying this information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it received funding

This alternative directly states that something received financial resources.

funding was provided for it

This rephrases the original to emphasize the action of providing funds.

it was financed

Replaces "funded" with a synonym, maintaining a formal tone.

it was supported financially

Adds specificity by highlighting the type of support.

resources were allocated to it

Shifts focus to the allocation process.

it was bankrolled

Implies substantial financial backing, often by a single entity.

it was subsidized

Suggests partial funding, often by a government.

it was endowed

Implies a long-term funding source, often for institutions.

grants were awarded for it

Focuses on the competitive nature of obtaining funds through grants.

investment was made in it

Highlights the aspect of expecting a return or benefit from the funding.

FAQs

How can I use "it was funded" in a sentence?

Use "it was funded" to indicate that something received financial support. For example, "The film /s/it+was+funded was funded by a grant from the film council."

What are some alternatives to saying "it was funded"?

You can use alternatives like "it received funding", "it was financed", or "funding was provided for it" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing how something was funded?

While "it was funded" (passive voice) is common, using the active voice (e.g., "The government funded the project") can often make your writing more direct and engaging.

What's the difference between "it was funded" and "it was sponsored"?

"It was funded" implies financial support, while "it was sponsored" suggests support that may include financial assistance but often involves promotion or endorsement. Sponsorship isn't always directly monetary.