it was follow

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was follow" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be a grammatical error, possibly intended to say "it was followed." Example: "After the meeting, it was follow by a discussion about the next steps."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was followed by Montana, New York, Maine and Wisconsin.

The New York Times

It was followed by six rapid detonations.

The New Yorker

(It was followed by "Horns" in 2010).

The New York Times - Books

But it was followed by familiar concerns.

The New York Times

It was followed by Eternal Echoes (2001).

Independent

It was followed by strong aftershocks.

The New York Times

It was followed by a kiss.

The New York Times

It was followed by a smaller aftershock.

The New York Times

It was followed by "The Graduate".

The New York Times

It was followed by one final expletive.

The Guardian - Sport

It was followed by www.navywives.com the next year.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the past participle form "followed" instead of "follow" after "it was" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, say "It was followed by a reception" instead of "It was follow by a reception".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb after "it was". Using "follow" instead of "followed" creates a grammatically incorrect sentence. Double-check your verb forms to maintain clarity and accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was follow" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form requires the past participle, making the proper structure "it was followed". As indicated by Ludwig, the correct form is "it was followed by".

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "it was follow" is grammatically incorrect and should be "it was followed by". As confirmed by Ludwig, the correct structure uses the past participle of the verb. This correction is crucial for clear and accurate communication. When aiming to express a sequence of events, ensure the use of "followed" to maintain grammatical integrity. Common alternatives include "it was succeeded by" or "it was accompanied by", depending on the context. Always prioritize using the correct past participle form to avoid confusion and maintain professionalism in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was followed by

Corrects the grammatical error by using the past participle form of the verb "follow".

it was succeeded by

Replaces "follow" with "succeed" to indicate a chronological sequence.

it was accompanied by

Uses "accompanied" to convey that something happened concurrently or immediately after.

it was preceded by

Indicates that something came before the subject, in reverse chronological order.

it was subsequent to

Emphasizes the temporal sequence and the fact that something happened after.

it was resultant from

Suggests a cause-and-effect relationship.

it resulted in

Focuses on the outcome of the initial event.

it led to

Indicates that the initial event was a direct cause of the subsequent event.

it gave rise to

Implies that the first event initiated or created the second event.

it brought about

Highlights that the initial event made the following event happen.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "it was follow"?

The correct way to phrase it is "it was followed by", using the past participle form of the verb.

What can I say instead of "it was follow" to indicate sequence?

You can use phrases like "it was succeeded by", "it was accompanied by", or "it was preceded by" depending on the intended meaning.

Is "it was follow" grammatically correct?

No, "it was follow" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "it was followed by".

What is the difference between "it was follow" and "it was followed by"?

"It was follow" is grammatically incorrect, while "it was followed by" is the correct way to indicate that something happened after something else.