it was evolved

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was evolved" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct form would typically be "it evolved" or "it was developed." Example: "Over the years, the software evolved to meet the changing needs of its users."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

But that ability, which it shares with a select group of other snakes, was acquired the old fashioned-way: It was evolved, of course.

The New York Times - Science

The fact that a certain chemical substance is restricted to a specific function, such as sex attraction, does not necessarily mean that it was evolved solely for that purpose.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was evolved from a method using anion exchanger microparticles agglomerated onto macroparticles of cation exchangers to produce anion exchangers.

Journal of Chromatography A

It differs from our data collection form as it was evolved later in the process of our analyses.

BMC Family Practice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

"I remember standing on a ridge at Blue Sky three years ago as it was evolving.

The New York Times - Sports

It was evolving into something other than an armed group dedicated to destroying Israel.

The New Yorker

The system was more open, and it was evolving.

Huffington Post

It's evolved to separates, or dresses.

The New York Times

"It amazes me what it's evolved to now".

The New York Times

It's evolved from there over the last five years.

The Guardian

" It is evolved to have an interaction with human beings.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the intended emphasis. If you wish to highlight an external force or process causing the evolution, "it was developed" might be more appropriate, although still distinct from "it was evolved".

Common error

Avoid using the passive construction "it was evolved" when the active form "it evolved" is clearer and more direct. The passive voice can obscure the agent of change, making the sentence less impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was evolved" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something underwent a process of evolution. As Ludwig AI points out, the standard English usage is to use the active voice, "it evolved", instead. The passive form, while present in some contexts, is less common and may sound awkward to native speakers.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "it was evolved" is occasionally used, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. The active voice form, "it evolved", is the preferred and more common choice for describing the process of something changing over time. As Ludwig AI indicates, using the active voice provides clearer and more direct communication. The phrase can be found in scientific and news contexts, but using more common alternatives enhances clarity and grammatical correctness. Always opt for stronger, more direct phrasing to improve the impact and readability of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it evolved

This alternative removes the passive voice, resulting in a more direct and common phrasing.

it has evolved

This alternative uses the present perfect tense, highlighting the ongoing relevance of the evolution.

it developed

This alternative uses a different verb to express a similar concept of gradual change and growth.

it was developed

This uses a passive voice construction with a different verb to show that something has been gradually built up or refined.

it underwent evolution

This alternative uses a noun form of 'evolve' to describe the process.

it experienced evolution

This alternative uses the verb 'experienced' to describe the process of evolution.

it transformed

This alternative emphasizes a more significant or radical change.

it matured

This emphasizes that the thing in subject improved and became better, more effective or complete.

it progressed

This alternative highlights the aspect of forward movement and improvement.

it advanced

This alternative emphasizes forward movement, often implying improvement or increased complexity.

FAQs

What is a more common way to say "it was evolved"?

More common alternatives include "it evolved" or "it has evolved", which are grammatically standard and widely accepted.

Is "it was evolved" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "it was evolved" is not the preferred phrasing. Using "it evolved" is generally more grammatically sound.

When should I use "it evolved" instead of "it was evolved"?

Use "it evolved" in most cases to describe the process of change. The passive form "it was evolved" is less common and can often be rephrased for better clarity.

What are some alternatives to "it was evolved" that emphasize development?

Consider using "it was developed" or "it developed" if you want to highlight the process of something being created or refined over time.