Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was destroying
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was destroying" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe an ongoing action in the past that caused damage or harm. Example: "The storm was so severe that it was destroying homes and uprooting trees in the area."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
29 human-written examples
"It was destroying a good life.
News & Media
In the end it was destroying everybody.
News & Media
They found English bitterly funny because it was destroying them.
News & Media
Some headlines even declared it was "destroying our planet".
News & Media
"Looking in the mirror, it was destroying me," Fox said, before pausing to compose herself.
News & Media
It was late nights and early mornings and it was destroying my shooting.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
30 human-written examples
It was destroyed, too.
News & Media
It was destroyed in the attack.
News & Media
(It was destroyed early this month by NATO airstrikes).
News & Media
It was destroyed in Erbil".
News & Media
It was destroyed during the 1938 hurricane.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "it was destroying", ensure the subject is clearly defined and the consequences of the destruction are evident to provide context for the severity of the situation. For example, "The flood was destroying homes and businesses, leaving the community devastated."
Common error
Avoid using "it was destroying" with abstract subjects that cannot be physically destroyed. Instead of saying "The argument was destroying their friendship", consider using "The argument was damaging their friendship" or "The argument was undermining their friendship".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was destroying" functions as a verb phrase indicating an ongoing action in the past that caused damage or ruin. Ludwig AI confirms this usage with numerous examples showing its application in describing various scenarios of destruction.
Frequent in
News & Media
88%
Wiki
6%
Encyclopedias
6%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "it was destroying" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to describe an ongoing action in the past that resulted in damage or ruin. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase appears frequently in news and media, often describing the impact of events or actions. While versatile, it's important to consider the subject and context when using this phrase, opting for alternatives like "it was damaging" or "it was ruining" if a less severe impact is intended. The provided examples illustrate the breadth of its usage, from describing environmental destruction to the deterioration of personal relationships.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was ruining
Emphasizes the process of causing damage or decay, making something less desirable or valuable. It focuses more on the negative impact than the complete obliteration.
it was damaging
Highlights the act of causing physical harm or impairment, often implying a more gradual or subtle negative effect.
it was wrecking
Focuses on the act of severely damaging or ruining something, implying a more forceful and destructive process.
it was devastating
Highlights the act of causing great emotional or physical damage and suffering; emphasizing the severe impact of destruction.
it was undermining
Implies a gradual weakening or erosion of something's foundation or strength, rather than outright destruction.
it was obliterating
Emphasizes the act of completely destroying or erasing something, leaving no trace behind. Implies more finality than "destroying".
it was annihilating
Stresses the complete destruction of something, often used in a more dramatic or exaggerated context.
it was dismantling
Implies taking something apart piece by piece, leading to its eventual ruin or non-functionality. Focuses on deconstruction.
it was corrupting
Focuses on the act of causing something to become morally or ethically impure, leading to its deterioration.
it was dissolving
Emphasizes the process of something breaking down or disintegrating, often implying a gradual and irreversible change.
FAQs
What's a less intense way to say "it was destroying"?
You can use softer alternatives such as "it was damaging" or "it was harming" if you want to convey a less severe impact.
How can I emphasize the completeness of the destruction caused by "it was destroying"?
To highlight total obliteration, consider using phrases like "it was annihilating" or "it was obliterating" to underscore the thoroughness of the damage.
Is "it was destroying" appropriate for describing emotional or psychological harm?
While "it was destroying" can be used for emotional or psychological harm, consider alternatives like "it was ruining" or "it was devastating" which may better capture the specific nature of the harm.
What's the difference between "it was destroying" and "it was damaging"?
"It was destroying" implies a more complete or severe form of damage, whereas "it was damaging" suggests a less extensive or more repairable harm. The choice depends on the degree of impact you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested