Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was contributed by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was contributed by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to attribute a work, idea, or resource to a specific person or group. Example: "The research findings were significant, and it was contributed by a team of dedicated scientists."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(17)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
It was contributed by the dissolution of ZnO nanoparticles and doping dedoping of polyaniline in the acidic and alkaline aqueous solutions.
Science
It was stored and cataloged with little interest after it was contributed by the library's field office in Nairobi; today it is one of only four known copies.
News & Media
It was contributed by the increase in microalgae concentration which absorbs the nutrients available, especially in tank T50, T75 and T100.
It was contributed by Tim Norbeck, CEO of the Physicians Foundation, and Walker Ray, MD, past president and current board member of the Physicians Foundation.
News & Media
It was contributed by the renowned historian Mary Beth Norton, one of the founding members of the club.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
Dr Sykes asked: "JWST went from $519m to $628m… it was about $100m that was contributed by the planetary science division to JWST.
News & Media
Reporting was contributed by Ken Belson from Tokyo.
News & Media
Reporting was contributed by Maggie Astor, Patricia Mazzei, William Neuman and Simon Romero.
News & Media
Reporting was contributed by John Eligon, Frances Robles, Liam Stack and Vivian Wang.
News & Media
Reporting was contributed by Charlie Savage, Joseph Goldstein, Riva Richmond and William K. Rashbaum.
News & Media
Reporting was contributed by Peter Baker, Alan Rappeport, David E. Sanger, Gardiner Harris and Nicholas Fandos.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Maintain consistency in attributing contributions; if citing multiple sources, use parallel grammatical structures for each to enhance readability.
Common error
Avoid using "it was contributed by" when an active voice would be more direct and impactful. For example, instead of "The success was contributed by the team", consider "The team contributed to the success".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was contributed by" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate the source or originator of something. It is used to attribute an action, idea, or item to a particular entity. As Ludwig AI suggests, it serves to highlight the recipient of the contribution.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Science
40%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "it was contributed by" serves to attribute credit or responsibility for something, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It functions as a passive voice construction, commonly used in news, science, and formal business contexts. Alternatives such as "provided by" or "supplied by" offer more concise options. When using the phrase, ensure clear attribution and consider whether an active voice would be more impactful. While grammatically correct, the passive structure can sometimes be less direct than the active voice. In general, be aware of overusing the expression.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was provided by
Focuses on the act of supplying something.
it was supplied by
Similar to 'provided', but can imply a more formal or official provision.
it stemmed from
Highlights the origin or root cause of something.
it originated from
Emphasizes the place or source of origin.
it resulted from
Indicates a cause-and-effect relationship.
it derived from
Suggests that something is taken or obtained from a source.
it was given by
Focuses on the act of bestowing or granting something.
it was furnished by
Implies the act of equipping or supplying necessities.
it was donated by
Highlights the act of giving something, often to a charity or cause.
it was imparted by
Suggests the conveying of knowledge, wisdom, or a quality.
FAQs
What is a more concise alternative to "it was contributed by"?
Alternatives include "provided by", "supplied by", or simply stating the source directly, such as "[source] contributed". These options can make your writing more direct and less wordy.
How can I use "it was contributed by" in a sentence?
Use "it was contributed by" to attribute something to a specific source. For instance, "The article was contributed by a team of researchers" indicates who provided the article.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with the phrase "it was contributed by"?
While grammatically correct, the passive voice in "it was contributed by" can sometimes be less impactful than the active voice. Consider rephrasing to use the active voice when appropriate, such as "The team contributed the article" instead of "The article was contributed by the team."
What are common mistakes to avoid when using the phrase "it was contributed by"?
Avoid overuse and ensure clear attribution. Overusing passive voice can make your writing sound convoluted. Also, make sure to specify who or what made the contribution to avoid ambiguity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested