it was concurred

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was concurred" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct form would typically be "it was concurred that" followed by a statement or agreement. Example: "After much discussion, it was concurred that the project would move forward as planned."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

However, it was concurred that we need to establish a common understanding of terminology.

AAPS Open

It was concurred that companies need to think both global (for general strategy) and local (for meeting specific local country-specific requirements) simultaneously.

AAPS Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"It was!" she concurred, laughing.

Huffington Post

I'm concurring with the question," he said.

The Guardian

"It is astonishing," concurred David Blohm, the chief executive of Smarterkids.com.

The New York Times

"It was really bad," concurred Higgins.

BBC

The intervening cause, if it is a concurring cause, does not break the chain of causation between the defendant's negligence and the plaintiff's injury simply because the intervening cause was unforeseeable.

Harvard University

It is also concurs with the period between likely dispersal event and onset of clinical signs in a BTV outbreak in Sweden [ 6].

BMC Veterinary Research

Indeed, the only writer for whom Kerouac had greater expectations was himself, and Ginsberg would learn the hard way that it was best to concur in this.

The New York Times - Books

Charlie Steele, an Albuquerque businessman, concurred: "It was a stump speech broken into many different parts".

The New York Times

"It was a stupid mistake," concurred 'Troche', who was not to blame for Veh's strange selection – no Mladen Petric, no Jonathan Pitroipa, Eljero Elia as a No10 – or his side's total inability to defend, however.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer "it was agreed" or "it was decided" for clearer and more standard English. These alternatives are widely accepted and avoid the grammatical ambiguity of "it was concurred".

Common error

Avoid using "it was concurred". Use active voice when possible (e.g., "the committee concurred") or choose a more standard passive construction like "it was agreed".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was concurred" functions as a passive construction, indicating agreement. However, it's less conventional than alternatives. Ludwig AI notes that standard English usage typically involves "it was concurred that" followed by a statement. The primary function is to convey that a consensus or agreement was reached.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "it was concurred" isn't strictly grammatically wrong, it's not the preferred way to express agreement in English. Ludwig AI advises that the correct form is usually "it was concurred that". More common and clearer alternatives like "it was agreed" or "it was decided" are generally recommended. The phrase's usage is infrequent and appears in both news and scientific contexts, suggesting a somewhat formal register. While it may not be incorrect in every instance, opting for more conventional phrases enhances clarity and ensures better communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was agreed

Replaces "concurred" with a more common and grammatically standard term for agreement.

it was decided

Indicates a decision was reached, implying agreement, but focuses on the outcome rather than the process of agreeing.

it was the consensus

Highlights that a general agreement or collective opinion was formed.

all parties concurred

Emphasizes that multiple individuals or groups were in agreement.

there was agreement

States the existence of agreement without specifying who agreed.

it was the understanding

Focuses on a shared comprehension or interpretation.

they were in accord

A more formal way of saying they were in agreement.

it was commonly accepted

Suggests widespread agreement or belief.

it was jointly determined

Implies a collaborative decision-making process.

the conclusion was

Highlights the result of a discussion or deliberation.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "concur" in a sentence?

The verb "concur" means to agree. You can say "I concur with that statement" or "The committee concurred". The passive construction "it was concurred" is less common and can sound awkward.

Is "it was concurred" grammatically correct?

While not strictly incorrect, "it was concurred" is not the standard way to express agreement. Alternatives like "it was agreed" or "it was decided" are preferred.

What can I say instead of "it was concurred"?

Better alternatives include "it was agreed", "it was decided", or "the parties concurred". The best choice depends on the specific context.

How does "it was concurred" differ from "it was agreed"?

"It was agreed" is a more common and widely accepted phrase. "It was concurred" is less frequent and can sound formal or even slightly unnatural to some native English speakers. Using "it was agreed" ensures clarity and avoids potential misinterpretations.