Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was caught for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was caught for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that something was captured or apprehended for a specific reason, but the construction is awkward and unclear. Example: "The fish was caught for dinner, but it was too small to keep."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Wiki
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
The first batter he faced, Jayson Werth, hit a deep drive to center field but it was caught for an out by Gardner, who collided into the outfield wall to complete the play.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
(Firm and white-fleshed, it is caught for both restaurants by Mark Marhefka, a local fisherman who has done much to educate Charleston about making commercial fishing in the South a sustainable enterprise).
News & Media
It is caught for food by artisanal fishers in Latin America, particularly in Mexico where it is one of the most economically important rays.
Wiki
But it was caught unprepared for the practical and mundane tasks of building state institutions.A large number of scientists left the country.
News & Media
It was neutral during the Thirty Years' War, but during the French revolutionary and Napoleonic wars (1792 1815) the city's trade was completely ruined, for it was caught between economic pressures exerted by the rival powers.
Encyclopedias
And it was caught in high-definition video for potentially millions to watch on cable television.
News & Media
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) fell out of a chair once, and unluckily for him, it was caught on video.
News & Media
It is caught commercially for food and also affords sport for anglers.
Encyclopedias
Yet its current owner claims that it is caught in a nasty war for survival against the Malkin family, which owns the Empire State Building.
News & Media
(unless you happen to know what those words mean) Never pretend to know about something that you don't know about: In the end you will state something false and be caught for it.
Wiki
For David Parsons, it's "Caught".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "it was caught for" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more precise alternatives like "it was captured for" or "it was intended for" to enhance readability.
Common error
The phrase "it was caught for" often results in a passive voice construction that is weak and indirect. Instead, rephrase the sentence to use an active voice with a more specific subject and verb to improve clarity and impact.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was caught for" functions as a passive construction attempting to link an action (catching) with a purpose. Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is awkward. Examples show that it tries to describe the reason something was captured, but it is not standard English.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Wiki
30%
Encyclopedias
15%
Less common in
Science
10%
Formal & Business
10%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "it was caught for" is an awkward and non-standard construction that attempts to link the act of capturing something with its intended purpose. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as incorrect and suggests that it lacks clarity. While it appears in various contexts, including news and general encyclopedias, it is best to avoid this phrase in formal writing. Instead, opt for clearer alternatives like "it was captured for" or "it was intended for" to express the intended meaning more effectively. By using more precise and active phrasing, you can enhance readability and impact.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was captured for
Replaces "caught" with "captured", which is a more formal and direct synonym, improving clarity.
it was apprehended for
Uses "apprehended" to convey a sense of official capture, suitable for legal or formal contexts.
it was intended for
Shifts the focus to the intended purpose, rather than the act of catching, clarifying the meaning.
it was destined for
Implies a preordained purpose, adding a sense of inevitability.
it was designed for
Highlights the design or planning behind its intended use.
it was made for
Focuses on the creation or manufacturing with a specific purpose in mind.
it was used for
Emphasizes the actual use or application, rather than the initial intent.
it served as
Indicates the function or role that something fulfilled.
it was utilized for
A more formal synonym for "used for", suggesting efficient or resourceful application.
it was chosen for
Highlights the selection process and the reasons behind choosing something for a particular purpose.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "it was caught for" that provide more clarity?
Consider alternatives like "it was captured for", "it was intended for", or "it was apprehended for" depending on the intended meaning.
Is "it was caught for" grammatically correct in formal writing?
While sometimes used, "it was caught for" is generally considered grammatically awkward and not ideal for formal writing. It's better to use clearer and more direct phrasing.
How can I rephrase a sentence using "it was caught for" to improve its impact?
Try restructuring the sentence to use an active voice and a more specific verb. For instance, instead of "it was caught for research", consider "they captured it for research" or "it served for research".
What is the difference between "it was caught for" and "it was caught by"?
"It was caught by" indicates who or what did the catching (e.g., "it was caught by the fisherman"), while "it was caught for" attempts to express the purpose of the capture, although it does so awkwardly. A better way to indicate purpose would be "it was intended for".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested