it was bring

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was bring" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be a grammatical error, possibly intended to be "it was bringing" or "it was brought." Example: "It was bringing back memories of our childhood."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

By the way, it was "bring a friend" day for Pies members.

The Guardian - Sport

What yoga did, without her realizing it, was bring those pathways back to life.

HuffPost

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

It was bringing employment.

The New York Times

It was brought back in 1992.

The New York Times

Then it was brought in-house.

The Guardian

It was brought from the maintenance area.

The New York Times

Twenty minutes later it was brought down.

The Guardian

First, it was brought in by Labour.

The Guardian

It was brought to the London fair by Rossella Colombari.

The New York Times - Arts

It was brought to light by Chen Guangcheng, a blind activist.

The Economist

It was bringing ideas to a much broader audience".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always ensure correct verb tense. "It was" should be followed by a verb in the present participle (-ing form) or used with the past participle to create the passive voice. Consider using "it was bringing" or "it was brought".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of a verb directly after "it was". This construction is grammatically incorrect. Use the correct tense (past continuous or simple past passive) to clearly express your intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was bring" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI analysis indicates this error, with suggestions for corrections such as "it was bringing" or "it was brought". The intended function is typically to describe an action in progress or a state of being acted upon.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Academia

22%

Science

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was bring" is grammatically incorrect. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, it should be corrected to either "it was bringing" (past continuous tense) or "it was brought" (passive voice). Although examples appear across News & Media and Academic contexts, the phrase's incorrect grammar significantly impacts its usability. Proper usage involves ensuring correct verb tense to clearly express the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

It was bringing

Corrects the grammar by using the present continuous tense, indicating an ongoing action.

It was brought

Corrects the grammar by using the past passive voice, indicating that something was caused to be.

It did bring

Uses 'did' for emphasis in the simple past, indicating a past action.

That prompted

Changes the structure to focus on causation, indicating something led to a result.

That resulted in

Focuses on the outcome, emphasizing the consequences of an action or event.

This caused

Emphasizes direct causation; something led directly to another thing.

The effect was

Shifts the focus to the result or effect of something, rather than the action itself.

This generated

Highlights the act of creation or production as a result of something.

That instigated

Indicates that something initiated or started a process or event.

It contributed to

Shows that something had an impact, adding to an overall result.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "it was bring" in a sentence?

You can correct it by using either the past continuous tense, such as "it was bringing", or the passive voice, such as "it was brought". The choice depends on the intended meaning.

What is the difference between "it was bringing" and "it was brought"?

"It was bringing" indicates an ongoing action in the past (e.g., It was bringing joy to many). "It was brought" indicates that something was caused to be (e.g., It was "brought to light" by the investigation).

When is it appropriate to use "it was brought" in a sentence?

"It was brought" is appropriate when you want to express that something was caused or delivered by an external force or action. For example, "The issue was "brought to our attention" by a customer complaint."

Are there alternatives to "it was bringing" that I can use to vary my writing?

Yes, you can use phrases such as "it was causing", "it was generating", or "it was contributing to", depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.