Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was agreement
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was agreement" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey that an agreement existed, but it lacks proper grammatical structure. Example: "After much discussion, it was clear that it was agreement among all parties involved."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
No. Instead, it was agreement on a bill to ban video voyeurism.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
It is agreement that is allusive not a format for discussion".
News & Media
It is agreement to disagree in private and to accept in public there is only one government view.
News & Media
I think it was an agreement".
News & Media
"We do not claim it was an agreement, but the file was finalized".
News & Media
Neither country had been conquered; it was an agreement freely entered into.
News & Media
It was that agreement, signed in 2005, that set the referendum in motion.
News & Media
"It was mutual agreement," Andrew Rosenthal, the editorial page editor, said of the change.
News & Media
It was the agreement that everyone wanted, yet no-one much liked.
News & Media
It was in agreement with the reported data (Chawla and Amiji, 2002; Natarajan et al. 2011).
It was in agreement with that of results available in the literature.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Instead of using the grammatically incorrect phrase "it was agreement", opt for "there was an agreement" or "an agreement was reached" to ensure clarity and correctness.
Common error
A common mistake is using "it was agreement" because "agreement" is a noun and needs an article ("an"). The correct phrasing requires a subject that can 'be' something, like "it was a deal" or "there was an agreement".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was agreement" is intended to express the existence of a consensus or accord. However, grammatically, it functions incorrectly as the verb "was" requires a noun phrase after it (like "it was an agreement"). Ludwig AI identifies this as not correct in standard written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
36%
Science
32%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Academia
8%
Encyclopedias
7%
Wiki
7%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "it was agreement" is grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI flags this issue, suggesting that "there was an agreement" or "it constituted an agreement" are more appropriate alternatives. While the intention is to convey consensus or accord, the phrase lacks proper grammatical structure. The most authoritative sources avoid this phrasing, opting for grammatically sound alternatives. Remember to use "there was an agreement" or "an agreement was reached" for clear, correct communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
there was agreement
Changes the sentence structure to use an existential "there was" construction, making it grammatically correct.
it was mutually agreed
Emphasizes the mutual nature of the agreement, highlighting that all parties were in accord.
an agreement was reached
Focuses on the act of reaching an agreement, implying a process and conclusion.
it was a consensus
Replaces "agreement" with "consensus", stressing a collective and unified opinion.
they were in agreement
Shifts the focus to the parties involved and their state of agreement.
it constituted an agreement
Suggests that something fulfilled the conditions of an agreement.
all parties concurred
Uses the verb "concurred" to indicate agreement, suitable for formal contexts.
there was accord
Replaces "agreement" with "accord", implying harmony and alignment.
it was understood
Indicates an implicit or unspoken agreement, focusing on shared understanding.
everyone was on the same page
Emphasizes a shared understanding and alignment of thoughts or plans.
FAQs
What's a grammatically correct alternative to "it was agreement"?
Instead of "it was agreement", use "there was an agreement" or "an agreement was reached". These options provide grammatical accuracy and clarity.
Is "it was agreement" ever considered acceptable in formal writing?
No, "it was agreement" is not considered acceptable in formal writing. It's grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in favor of more appropriate phrases like "it was mutually agreed".
How can I use "agreement" correctly in a sentence?
To use "agreement" correctly, frame it as "there was an agreement", or use it with verbs like "reach", "sign", or "come to". For example, "They reached an agreement".
What's the difference between saying "it was agreement" and "it was a consensus"?
"It was agreement" is grammatically incorrect. "It was a consensus" is grammatically correct and implies a collective, unified opinion, while "there was an agreement" refers to a formal or informal accord.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested