Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it should previous
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it should previous" is not correct in English.
It seems to be an incorrect combination of words and does not convey a clear meaning. An example of a corrected phrase could be: "It should precede the main event."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
"World trade is not developing as fast as it should, previous fast-growing economies are slowing down and only today Japan entered recession," he added.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
It should include previous hospitalizations, injuries, operations, and any significant illness that may not have required hospitalization.
Encyclopedias
The Sounders did get to the Western Conference final last year — which was progress — though winning by the only goal over two tight legs against RSL perhaps felt less cathartic than it should, after the previous season's fireworks.
News & Media
It should say the previous folder's name and a ".zip" file extension name.
Wiki
It should be noted that previous studies focused on very fast SAPS events and did not discuss the slowest limit of SAPS.
Science
However, it should be noted that previous studies concerning the meteorological conditions of winter lightning in Japan have indicated different results.
It should be noted that previous research comparing lineups and showups relied on the diagnosticity ratio (correct IDs/false IDs), which ignored filler ID rates (e.g., Lindsay & Wells, 1985; Steblay, Dysart, & Wells, 2011).
It should be noted that previous theory works have also studied the hole mobility in ultra-narrow Si nanowires by solving the linearized Boltzmann transport equation coupled to the atomistic tight-binding approach [29, 30].
Science
It should be noted that previous publications suggest minor alleles present at 1% are easily and reproducibly detected by CTCE [12], [13].
Science
It should be mentioned that previous studies have found that the phospho-eEF-2 occurs within 15 min following the activation of NMDA receptors, and this phosphorylation is accompanied by protein synthesis inhibition [45], [48].
Science
It should be mentioned that previous work showed that VGAT contacts on GnRH neurons are decreased in the rPOA during the estradiol-induced LH surge in young ovariectomized rats [28].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When intending to express that something should happen before something else, replace the incorrect phrase "it should previous" with grammatically correct alternatives like "it should precede" or "it should come before".
Common error
Avoid using the adjective "previous" in place of an adverb or verb. "Previous" describes a noun, whereas you likely need a verb like "precede" or an adverbial phrase to indicate sequence.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it should previous" is an attempt to express temporal precedence or priority. However, it fails grammatically because "previous" is an adjective, not a verb or adverb, and cannot correctly follow "should". Ludwig AI identifies this as an incorrect word combination.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Encyclopedias
33%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "it should previous" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI flags it as an improper combination of words. To convey the idea of something preceding something else, it's recommended to use alternatives such as "it should precede", "it should come before", or "it should be prior to". These options provide grammatical correctness and clarity. The limited and varied context of its use, alongside its flawed structure, suggests avoiding "it should previous" in favor of more standard English.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it should precede
Replaces "previous" with the verb "precede" to indicate that something comes before something else in time or order.
it should come before
Uses a phrasal verb to clearly express the idea of one thing happening or being done before another.
it should be prior
Employs "prior" as an adjective to denote precedence or higher importance.
it should have priority
Indicates that something deserves more immediate attention or importance than something else.
it should be first
Expresses that something needs to be in the initial position or sequence.
it should be earlier
Denotes that something should occur at an earlier time than something else.
it should be in advance
Suggests that something should be prepared or done ahead of time.
it should be the first step
Clarifies that something is the initial action required in a process.
it ought to precede
Uses "ought to" to convey a sense of duty or correctness in preceding.
it needs to be earlier
Emphasizes the necessity of something occurring at an earlier point in time.
FAQs
What does "it should previous" mean?
The phrase "it should previous" is not grammatically correct in English. It appears to be an incorrect combination of words. A corrected phrase could be "it should precede the main event".
How can I use "it should previous" in a sentence correctly?
Since "it should previous" is grammatically incorrect, it's best to use alternative phrases like "it should precede" or "it should come before" to convey your intended meaning.
Which is correct: "it should previous" or "it should precede"?
"It should precede" is the correct phrase. "It should previous" is grammatically incorrect.
What's the difference between "it should previous" and "it should be prior to"?
"It should previous" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't have a clear meaning. "It should be prior to" is grammatically correct and means that something should happen before something else.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested