Sentence examples for it should be labeled from inspiring English sources
First, it should be labeled "Grade 1" or "Grade 2".
The show is called "Conan" but it felt at times like it should be labeled "I'm Not Jay".
Randall Hodgkinson's piano recital at Bargemusic on Friday night would qualify to many as contemporary when it should be labeled classic.
In fish stores, the best of what the blue crab has to offer, the solid chunks of sweet white meat from the back fin, is marked "jumbo lump," but it should be labeled "food of the gods".
Re "The Disorder Is Sensory; the Diagnosis, Elusive" (June 5): As a teacher I attended workshops on Sensory Integration Dysfunction, and while I was never convinced that it should be labeled a disability, studying the "symptoms" allowed me to understand those children better and to help parents see them not as problem children, but as kids whose skills were still maturing.
Their fans made a "Damn Yankees -type pact -- or, in this instance, it should be labeled "Damn Celtics" -- to ensure that Willis Reed was able to plaYankees -typen 1970 and that he was able to come back from a devastating knee injury in 1973.
Its latest identity crisis is deciding whether it should be labelled Witch City at all, or simply one that just happens to have witches – as illustrated by the logo of the city's tourism organisation, Destination Salem - a stylised triangle that looks like either a witch's hat or a ship sail, depending on your perspective.
If an article contains an anecdote involving either a dog or an animal with cloven hooves in the first three paragraphs, it should be labelled as a "Commentary," whereas if it mentions the United Nations anywhere in the body of the piece it is a "News Analysis".
Cloforex is labelled as negative in the dataset [23] but Ryrfeldt [24] suggested that it should be labelled as positive, and procaine is a CAD which does not induce phospholipidosis, perhaps due to its low logP.
This does not imply that it should be labelled as a disorder.
We advocate that if a trial is meant to be definitive or practice-changing (i.e. no follow-on trial of the same question is expected), it should be labelled as a Phase III trial, despite pragmatic compromises on sample size, error margins and other design elements.
