it resulted in

USAGE SUMMARY

"it resulted in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to explain the consequences of a certain event or situation. For example: "The school's decision to close down the music program resulted in a decrease in student enrollment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It resulted in its decompression and, as consequence, the space rocket lost its attitude control.

TechCrunch

"It resulted in no changes at all".

The New York Times

"But it resulted in a smooth election".

The New York Times

It resulted in a standing ovation.

The Guardian - Music

It resulted in my paycheck being cut".

The New York Times

It resulted in my becoming a republican.

The Guardian

Prove it resulted in a kid?

The Guardian - Opinion

It resulted in the franchise's first title.

The New York Times - Sports

This time, it resulted in the go-ahead touchdown.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

"Sometimes it results in very unpleasant decisions.

The New York Times - Arts

"What's it result in?" he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it resulted in", ensure the subject clearly indicates what caused the outcome. Clarity enhances readability and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "it resulted in" when the 'it' lacks a clear antecedent. Ensure the 'it' refers to a specific action or situation, not a general concept.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it resulted in" functions as a causal connector, indicating that a previous action or event led to a specific outcome. It's used to establish a cause-and-effect relationship, as supported by examples from Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it resulted in" is a versatile and frequently used phrase to indicate causation and consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and highlights its prevalence across various domains, especially news, science, and formal communication. While alternatives like "it led to" or "it caused" offer similar meanings, the choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. When using this phrase, ensure that the subject clearly defines what caused the outcome to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. All in all, "it resulted in" is a reliable choice for expressing cause-and-effect relationships.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it led to

Focuses more on the direction of the consequence.

it caused

Implies a direct causation.

it brought about

Highlights the act of initiating a change or outcome.

it gave rise to

Emphasizes the emergence of something new as a consequence.

it produced

Suggests a more tangible or direct outcome.

it generated

Focuses on the creation or production of something.

it occasioned

Highlights the opportunity or reason for the outcome.

it was responsible for

Emphasizes accountability or agency.

it contributed to

Shows how an element factored into the result, rather than being the sole driver.

it fostered

Emphasizes promotion or growth resulting from the initial action.

FAQs

How can I use "it resulted in" in a sentence?

Use "it resulted in" to show a direct consequence of a previous action or event. For example, "The new policy it resulted in a decrease in employee turnover."

What are some alternatives to "it resulted in"?

You can use alternatives like "it led to", "it caused", or "it brought about" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "it resulted in" or "it was a result of"?

"It resulted in" indicates causation (A caused B), while "it was a result of" indicates consequence (A is caused by B). The choice depends on the desired emphasis.

What's the difference between "it resulted in" and "it affected"?

"It resulted in" implies a direct outcome or consequence, while "it affected" suggests an influence, which may not be a direct or sole cause.