Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The evidence it presented was seen by supporters of Congregationalism as evidence of its worth, and by English opponents as evidence of its failings.
(The Times released a statement saying that the information it presented was "neither graphic nor disrespectful of victims, and consistent with the common line of reporting on weapons used in horrific crimes, as The Times and other media outlets have done following terrorist acts around the world, from Boston to Paris to Baghdad, and many places in between").
Then, on June 1, Wright vs Curtiss aired and the worst of the concerns held by people who value truth and history above drama were confirmed... the storyline was exploitative, false in several central and critical areas and as one aviation historian said, "The level of historical filth it presented was enough to make me want to clean my TV afterward".
Furthermore, the analytical method used in the article (likelihood based mixed models repeated measures approach) was added after completion of the protocol, but the journal article did not mention that the analysis it presented was not the primary efficacy analysis specified in the protocol.
Similar(56)
The difficulties it presented were dizzying.
Its theory is precise; the historical evidence it presents is convincing and sometimes novel.
The story it presents is beyond dispute.
The picture it presents is impressively comprehensive, though some of it is also bleak.
The list price may seem steep, but the paradox it presents is priceless.
The way in which it is presented is that it is in the national interest.
Though there is overhype, the technological and investment opportunities it presents are very, very real.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com