Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Ryan Anderson, a Heritage Fellow, makes a similar argument based on reproduction, which is fine, but why then does it not apply to non-procreative heterosexuals?
If the equal protection clause applies to different counting standards why does it not apply to those Gore voters whose ballots have not now been counted?
Should it not apply equally to "grue" as to "green"?
I recognize if that were the policy why would it not apply to accused robbers, embezzlers, arsonists, terrorists, murderers, etc.? The accusations affect their privacy and stigmatize their reputations as well.
People are tweeting shit like "Katie Hopkins: UK Has Gone Mad, We Will Tolerate The Slaughter Of Little Girls But Can't Tolerate Free Speech," and, "Whatever happened to free speech does it not apply to Katie Hopkins?" Truth be told, it's a good question, because I've been led to believe that free speech is absolute and unfettered.
Similar(51)
If it does not apply, it is simply irrelevant to the outcome.
If it has not, apply it again with your method of choice.
It may not apply or it may be varied in some way.
The Cambridge Council passed its ordinance in 1999, but it does not apply to Harvard.
It will not apply on public streets.
Well it did not apply to her!
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com