it needs more science

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it needs more science" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a topic or project that requires additional scientific research or evidence to support its claims or conclusions. Example: "While the initial findings are interesting, it needs more science to validate the results before we can draw any definitive conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"It needs more science to be able to say that".

The New York Times - Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Here is Stephen Hawking's verdict on the movie about his marriage: it needed more science.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

And just thinking that I need more science classes, more stuff under my belt before I can do [research]." Other students look up to fellows such as Jodi as those students with the most talent, ability, and opportunities.

CBE Life Sciences Education

It is an accepted fact, to the point of cliché, that the United States needs more science majors to someday work at all those surplus science jobs.

Science Magazine

U.S. needs more science to understand sun-blocking, carbon-removal technologies.

Science Magazine

The electorate needs more science stories, not less.

Huffington Post

Ramesh refused to accept China had stepped out of line, although he conceded: "We still need more science to understand whether global warming is causing glacial melt or whether it is the natural cycles".

The Guardian

We don't need more science here, I've been doing this for 31 years".

The Guardian

Privacy Guy thinks philosophers impressed by this argument "need more science classes".

The New York Times

We need more science, not less, if we are to feed the coming world of 9.5bn in 2050 without further destroying fragile ecosystems and driving more species to extinction.

The Guardian

Responding to a question at a public forum in Toms River, he said, "I think we're going to need more science to prove something one way or the other".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Employ this phrase when highlighting the need for rigorous methodology and empirical evidence to support an argument, especially in technical or academic contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "it needs more science" as a dismissive statement against non-scientific perspectives; instead, use it to advocate for evidence-based approaches to address gaps in understanding. For example, don't assume that the absence of a double-blind study invalidates traditional medicine: non-Western practices may be effective, and it can be beneficial to scientifically analyze them rather than dismiss them out of hand.

Linguistic Context

Function: The phrase "it needs more science" functions as a statement indicating the necessity of further scientific inquiry or evidence to validate a claim, theory, or practice. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It serves to highlight gaps in current understanding that can be addressed through scientific investigation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Reference

4%

Encyclopedias

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it needs more science" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase that underscores the necessity for further scientific investigation and evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is suitable for written English, particularly when advocating for a rigorous, evidence-based approach in various discussions. While applicable in various contexts, it is most prevalent in news and media, science, and formal business environments. When using the phrase, ensure it is employed to advocate for evidence-based approaches, and avoid using it dismissively. Semantically, alternatives such as "further research is needed" or "more scientific evidence is required" can be used to express similar sentiments with slight variations in emphasis. Overall, understanding the appropriate context and potential misinterpretations ensures effective communication when using the phrase "it needs more science".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more scientific investigation is needed

Focuses on the requirement for deeper scrutiny through research.

additional scientific evidence is necessary

Highlights the importance of gathering more proof through scientific methods.

more scientific data is required

Highlights the importance of gathering a greater quantity of scientific facts and figures.

further scientific study is required

Emphasizes the necessity of additional academic research.

it requires further scientific validation

Highlights the necessity for confirming findings with scientific rigor.

a more thorough scientific analysis is essential

Stresses the importance of a detailed and comprehensive scientific evaluation.

the science is incomplete

Implies that the current scientific understanding is not yet fully developed.

scientific research is lacking

Indicates a deficiency or absence of scientific data.

scientific backing is insufficient

Suggests that there's a lack of support from the scientific community.

further research is essential

Stresses the fundamental need for further investigation. This is a more general phrase.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "it needs more science"?

Alternatives include "further research is needed", "more scientific evidence is required", or "additional investigation is necessary", depending on the specific context.

In what situations is it appropriate to say "it needs more science"?

This phrase is suitable when discussing topics where empirical evidence and scientific methodology are crucial, such as in research proposals, policy discussions, or evaluations of claims lacking sufficient scientific backing.

What does it mean when someone says "it needs more science"?

It generally means that the existing information or understanding of a topic is incomplete or lacks sufficient scientific support, implying a necessity for further research and analysis.

Is "it needs more science" a formal or informal expression?

While generally suitable for both formal and informal contexts, it is often used in professional settings to advocate for rigorous scientific approaches or point out deficiencies in current evidence. The formality depends on the surrounding language and the overall context.