Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
However, if the sampler is willing to live with the possible risk of some bias and less certain estimates of precision when compared with actual simple random sampling, Gordon and Pont's methods may prove satisfactory.
Hosting it may prove harder.
But it may prove irrelevant.
It may prove too wonkish.
It may prove scarce.
It may prove effective.
It may prove contentious.
But it may prove a pyrrhic victory.
It may prove a year too late.
It may prove an own-goal.
It may prove the undoing of him.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com