it managed for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it managed for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to convey that something was successfully handled or dealt with, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "Despite the challenges, it managed for a while before the issues became too overwhelming."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

TOKYO — Japanese financial authorities suspended the operations of a money management firm on Friday after it was unable to account for the bulk of $2.6 billion in pension funds it managed for its clients.

The New York Times

PAGE A17 BUSINESS JAPANESE MONEY FUND TOLD TO HALT OPERATIONS Japanese financial authorities suspended the operations of AIJ Investment Advisors, a money management firm that was until recently the darling of Japanese fund managers, after it was unable to account for the bulk of $2.6 billion in pension funds it managed for its clients.

The New York Times

Although it managed for years to expand its hydrocarbon production — even as larger rivals like Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell struggled to keep output from falling — that run ended last year when it reported a production drop.

The New York Times

Bright and forthright, it managed for the most part to bridge the conflicting requirements of music and dance for just the right tempos.

The New York Times - Arts

Ms. Ghilarducci said that if a public system like Calpers adopted her idea, the money it managed for companies would be kept separate from the money for cities and other local governments.

The New York Times

The memo, from CVS/Caremark, a pharmacy benefit management company, and dated Monday, notified pharmacies that the generic form of Lipitor would not be covered for 29 prescription drug plans it managed for Medicare Part D. Instead, any prescription claims for generic atorvastatin will be rejected with a notice saying: "Brand Lipitor will pay at generic co-pay".

The New York Times - Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Artivest makes money through placement fees with the funds it backs and management fees for the special funds it manages for its wealthy clients.

TechCrunch

Acorns relies on micro-transactions, based on its round-up savings and investment system which rounds up amounts of purchases to the nearest dollar and invests the difference in exchange-traded funds that it manages for its customers.

TechCrunch

Since an individual's benefit rises with each year of service, the employer is supposed to sock money away, into a fund that it manages for all of its beneficiaries, every year.

The New York Times - Magazine

BlackRock derives much of its income from fees for the accounts it manages for clients.

The New York Times

In addition, it manages for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Md., where observational data from the Hubble Space Telescope are processed and analyzed.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the act of successfully handling something, use stronger verbs like "handled", "managed effectively", or "successfully oversaw" for better clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid using "manage" in a way that sounds incomplete. Ensure it is followed by a direct object or a preposition that clearly indicates what is being managed and for what purpose. For example, prefer "it managed the project successfully" over "it managed for a while."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it managed for" functions as a verb phrase aiming to convey successful handling or administration. However, Ludwig AI notes that it lacks clarity and grammatical correctness in standard written English. To be considered correct you should use alternatives like "it succeeded in" or "it coped with".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

12.5%

Less common in

Wiki

12.5%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "it managed for" appears in various contexts, including news, media, and scientific articles, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable in standard English. The phrase aims to convey the handling of something over a duration but lacks the precision of alternatives like "it successfully handled" or "it effectively managed". For clear and impactful writing, especially in formal settings, opting for grammatically stronger and more direct phrases is advisable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was able to handle

Replaces "managed" with "was able to handle" for a more direct and grammatically sound expression.

it handled

Similar to 'dealt with,' but implies a degree of skill or competence.

it successfully managed

Adds "successfully" to emphasize positive management, improving clarity.

it dealt with

A more conversational and versatile alternative, suitable for various contexts.

it took care of

Uses "took care of" as a simple and clear alternative to "managed".

it oversaw

Replaces "managed" with "oversaw" to indicate a supervisory role.

it supervised

Similar to 'oversaw', but emphasizes guidance and control.

it saw to

Suggests ensuring something is done properly.

it administered

Suggests a formal or official handling of something.

it controlled

Emphasizes the act of maintaining command or regulation.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "manage" in a sentence?

Ensure that "manage" is followed by a direct object that specifies what is being managed, or use it with an adverb that indicates success, such as "managed effectively."

What are some alternatives to "it managed for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "it successfully handled", "it effectively managed", or "it was able to handle", depending on the context.

Is "it managed for" grammatically correct?

The phrase "it managed for" is often considered grammatically weak and can sound incomplete. It's best to use more direct and specific alternatives.

What is the difference between "it managed" and "it managed for"?

"It managed" implies a successful outcome in general. "It managed for" needs additional context to explain what was managed and for what purpose, and it's often better replaced with clearer alternatives. Without that context the phrase could be considered non-standard.