"it is surprising to note" is a correct sentence in written English.
You can use this phrase when you are making an observation and you find the situation or outcome surprising. For example: "It is surprising to note that the number of students enrolled in our school has decreased since last year."
It is surprising to note that the airports have historically been more dangerous than the airspace in terms of collisions.
However, it is surprising to note that resistant allele of xa25 was found to be predominant in breeding lines and varieties.
It is surprising to note that while Apo is the drought-tolerant genotype, IR64-specific allele is preferentially expressed in the hybrid.
It is surprising to note that despite the prominence that mission statements carry, considering the popular talk regarding it amongst academicians and practitioners, there is inadequate quantity and quality of research on mission statements (Bart et al. 2001).
The above discussions clarify that, although it was realised in the early development of the CSSM [43] that the compression response should be presented in a normalised stress plot [as in Eqs. (2) or (3)], it is surprising to note that no attempt has been made to define a proper normalising parameter for the compression behaviour of soils.
Given the importance of this motif, it is surprising to note that it is not conserved among invertebrates.
SOUND LEVEL Given the 20-foot ceilings and all the open floor space, it's surprising to note that it's the sort of room where one could have a conversation.
The four-year-olds did the things that four-year-olds do – whispered secrets, threw tantrums, picked their noses – and it was surprising to note how defined their personalties already were.
Given this, his irony, the intertextual games that connect one distant corner of his fiction to another, and the recurring themes that form the churning centres of his work (exile, idealism, power relations, art), it's surprising to note how moving his writing can be.
It was surprising to note that only one statistically significant difference was found in the responses provided by radiology practitioners and radiographers, although we do recognise that the small sample of radiology practitioners may have contributed to this result.
While these factors have resulted in a 23% overall reduction in PubChem after filtration, it was surprising to note in Table 1 that the Pharmacology subset showed the largest reduction from any source of 63%.
