Suggestions(5)
Exact(3)
In any event, Sellars's account also faces the difficulty noted above with Goodman's account: it is only plausible on a realist semantics, because if 'predicate' meant 'predicate token' there would not even be enough predicates for every word in the dictionary, much less every sentence in the language.
On the contrary, it is only plausible to expect more pronounced changes and higher significance with a larger patient population.
If anything, as it is only plausible that parity affects mean sTfR rather than sTfR concentrations determining parity, the most conceivable explanation would be that sTfR concentrations are the explanatory variable to the association between parity and vaginal microflora status.
Similar(57)
Russell's rationale for endorsing negative facts was somewhat complicated (see, e.g., PLA, 211 15); however, one might object that on his earlier view, according to which "R a, b)" is false because it lacks a corresponding complex, is only plausible if you suppose that it must be a fact that there is not such a complex, and such a fact would itself seem to be a negative fact.
The idea that individuals could use their private firearms to mount a serious challenge to government hegemony is only plausible in very weak states.
But this is only plausible on a realist semantics.
They feel the presumption of non-existence is only plausible for particular existence claims.
But that suggestion is only plausible if the size of the prize does not affect your judgement of the relative likelihood of these two events.
This is because the Sure Thing Principle is only plausible if outcomes are specific enough to account for any sort of dependencies between outcomes in different states of the world.
This is only plausible if we assume that the protocells still relied on external amino acid sources, thus subpar, but abundant pairs need to be maintained as well.
It is only as plausible as the Kantian framework itself is.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com