Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
It is objectively true or false — and it happens to be false.
The majority argued that it is objectively true that human life begins at conception, and that the state can force doctors to say so.
Hugh Prestwood Greenport, N.Y., Oct. 29, 2008 To the Editor: When the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit said "it is objectively true that human life begins at conception," it ignored the preponderant position of legal scholars, doctors and members of the clergy who do not believe a fertilized egg is entitled to the full protection of the law enjoyed by a live born infant.
Many women deny it, even when it is objectively true.
In other words, just because something is repeated several times, we perceive it as more true, regardless of whether it is objectively true or not!
I once heard a lecture given by Professor Steven Goldman at Lehigh University, and he defined "belief" as something that influences our actions -- whether or not it is objectively true.
Similar(53)
I say it only because I think it's objectively true.
Hobbes's description of life in the state of nature as "nasty, brutish and short" is so familiar we can forget that, for most of the people who have ever lived, it was objectively true.
In particular, given that human beings' perceptions are shaped by the assumptions of their culture and thus have a natural inclination to view their own culture as superior, isn't it infinitely more likely that people view their society as objectively superior because they're inculcated from birth in all sorts of overt and subtle ways to believe this rather than because it's objectively true?
Whether or not it's objectively true, and whether or not it's helpful, we tend to simply accept our inner monologue as fact.
I wish this wasn't the case, but it's objectively true, because most women (besides dancers and performance history majors) are smart enough to avoid professions with no real hope of money, recognition, or basic respect.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com