it is identified to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it is identified to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning; a more appropriate phrase would be needed to express identification or association. Example: "The specimen is identified to belong to a new species."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Perchlorate bears health risks as it is identified to impair normal thyroid function by interfering with iodine uptake by the thyroid gland.

Environmental Sciences Europe

On the basis of this comparison, it is identified to which category out of four this potential interference belongs and the characteristic value of the nominal edge weight factor is assigned for the identified interference category.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

If a query sequence meets all of the criteria in one rule, then it is identified to B-cell epitopes of HCV.

BMC Medical Genomics

Furthermore, the lncRNA ENST00000480739 does not contain a valid Kozak sequence and it is identified to be an lncRNA rather than a protein-coding transcript by CNCI software (The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA) (Sun et al, 2013).

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

It was identified to be azukisaponin V, which was consistent with the previous articles [24, 28, 29].

Chemistry Central Journal

It was identified to be an effective and simple synthetic strategy to form the uniform nanofibers about 350 nm in size.

Materials Science and Engineering: C

Thus, it was identified to be a native and active protein, as the binding mechanism relies on catalytic activity of the enzyme.

Journal of Biotechnology

14 Initially it was identified to be upregulated in colonic epithelial cells.

Cancer Management and Research

It was identified to have a critical role in the formation of cytoplasmic proteinaceous inclusion.

Cell Death and Disease

It was identified to be shared between four angiosperm genomes (Arabidopsis, Populus, Vitis, and Oryza) as a nSCG [ 22].

BMC Evolutionary Biology

It has been identified to be an endogenous ligand of prostaglandin FP receptors.

British Journal of Pharmacology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "it is identified to" in formal writing. Instead, opt for clearer and grammatically correct alternatives like "it is identified as" or "it is recognized as".

Common error

A common mistake is using "to be" when "as" is needed. Remember that "identified" requires a preposition indicating the manner or category of identification. Incorrect: It is identified to be a new species. Correct: It is identified as a new species.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it is identified to" functions as part of a passive construction, attempting to express the recognition or classification of a subject. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, it's grammatically incorrect and unclear.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it is identified to" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English. As Ludwig AI clearly states, it's unclear and doesn't convey a clear meaning. Although examples can be found, primarily in science and news contexts, it's crucial to use grammatically sound alternatives like "it is identified as", "it is recognized as", or "it has been identified as" for clarity and correctness. Relying on more established and accurate phrasing will significantly improve the quality and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it is recognized as

Replaces the passive voice construction to provide a more direct and grammatically sound expression.

it is classified as

Focuses on categorization, offering a clearer and more precise meaning than the original phrase.

it is known to be

Emphasizes established knowledge or general acceptance, correcting the grammatical awkwardness.

it has been identified as

Uses a passive perfect construction to emphasize prior identification, providing better grammatical correctness.

it is determined to be

Highlights the act of reaching a conclusion or decision about something's identity.

it is found to be

Emphasizes the act of discovery, suggesting that something was revealed through investigation.

it is diagnosed as

Specifically used in medical or scientific contexts when referring to identifying a condition or disease.

it is labeled as

Focuses on the act of assigning a name or category, providing a simple and direct alternative.

it is designated as

Highlights the act of officially assigning a role or status.

it is understood to be

Emphasizes a shared understanding or general consensus about something's nature.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "it is identified to" to make it grammatically correct?

The phrase "it is identified to" is grammatically incorrect. Better alternatives include "it is identified as", "it is recognized as", or "it has been identified as", depending on the intended meaning.

What does "it is identified to" mean, and why is it considered incorrect?

While the intended meaning might be to express that something has been recognized or classified, "it is identified to" doesn't follow standard English grammar. More precise and correct alternatives like "it is classified as" or "it is known to be" are recommended.

In what contexts might I encounter the phrase "it is identified to", and should I avoid it?

You might encounter "it is identified to" in informal writing or when the writer isn't a native English speaker. However, it's best to avoid this phrase in any formal context and replace it with a grammatically correct alternative such as "it is determined to be" or "it is found to be".

Is there a subtle difference in meaning between "it is identified as" and "it is identified to be"?

The phrase "it is identified to be" is less common and can often be simplified to "it is identified as". The "as" construction is generally more direct and preferred. Consider also "it is labeled as" or "it is designated as" depending on context.