it is identified for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it is identified for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey that something is recognized or designated for a specific purpose, but the phrasing is awkward. Example: "The project is identified for its innovative approach to renewable energy solutions."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It is identified for the first time that the charge overpotentials are affected mainly by the inherent surface charge character of the alloy catalyst.

Journal of Power Sources

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Maspin gene is located on chromosome 18q21.3 q23 and it was identified for the first time in 1994.

Clinical and Translational Medicine

An equal number of allergic asthmatics on IT were identified for comparison.

BioMed Research International

It was identified for the eight putative bovSERPINA3s by analogy with other serpins.

BMC Genomics

Motifs reported as pathway-specific were enriched at or above the 95% percentile for the pathway in which it was identified for at least two of the three species.

BMC Genomics

This evaluation set illustrates how difficult it is identify targets for new compounds.

Journal of Cheminformatics

The company asked that it not be identified for the safety of its other military translators and their families.

The New York Times

First, it is identifying new targets for the traditional sort of small-molecule drug.

The Economist

However, it is possible that the thyroid nodule signalled a malignancy to the participating GPs, particularly because it was identified specifically for action in the hospital discharge letter.

BMJ Open

As the scattering behaviour is highly wavelength-dependent it needs to be identified for specific applications.

Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications

The "sad" expression was missed the most, for 57 times, where it was identified as "neutral" for 31 times.

Journal of Big Data

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the purpose for which something is identified, clarify the specific attribute or role that makes it suitable. For example, instead of "it is identified for potential use", specify "it is identified as a potential solution for energy storage".

Common error

Avoid vague uses of "it is identified for" without clearly stating what it is identified as. Ensure your sentence specifies the role, purpose, or characteristic for which the subject is being identified to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it is identified for" functions as a passive construction aiming to highlight a characteristic or purpose. However, Ludwig AI shows the construction may lack clarity. It typically introduces what something is recognized or designated for, but the phrasing itself can be awkward and often requires further clarification to avoid vagueness.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "it is identified for" aims to highlight a specific characteristic or purpose, it's often deemed grammatically awkward and lacks clarity. As Ludwig AI suggests, the phrase is not correct in standard written English. The analysis of examples reveals that it appears in scientific and news contexts, but more precise alternatives like "recognized as", "designated as", or "earmarked for" are often preferable. For best practices, ensure the sentence clearly states what the subject is identified as to avoid vagueness. Therefore, consider using alternative phrasings to enhance clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it is recognized as

Replaces "identified" with "recognized", focusing on acknowledgment rather than discovery. Shifts the emphasis slightly from pinpointing to general acceptance.

it is designated as

Substitutes "identified" with "designated", implying a formal assignment or classification. Emphasizes the act of officially specifying something for a purpose.

it is known as

Replaces "identified" with "known", focusing on general awareness or common knowledge. Suggests that the subject is widely acknowledged under a particular name or description.

it is classified as

Replaces "identified" with "classified", highlighting the act of categorizing something according to specific criteria. Implies a systematic arrangement based on shared characteristics.

it is regarded as

Substitutes "identified" with "regarded", emphasizing a particular opinion or viewpoint. Implies that something is viewed in a certain way by a specific group or individual.

it is considered to be

Replaces "identified" with "considered to be", presenting a more tentative or subjective assessment. Suggests that something is being evaluated or judged in a particular light.

it is labeled as

Replaces "identified" with "labeled", emphasizing the assignment of a specific descriptor or identifier. Implies a clear, often standardized, designation.

it is earmarked for

Substitutes "identified" with "earmarked", suggesting that something has been specifically set aside for a particular purpose. Focuses on the allocation or reservation of resources.

it is singled out for

Replaces "identified" with "singled out", highlighting the act of selecting something from a larger group. Emphasizes the distinctiveness or exceptional quality of the chosen item.

it is distinguished by

Replaces "identified for" with "distinguished by", emphasizing the unique characteristics that set something apart. Shifts focus from the act of identification to the distinguishing features.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the phrase "it is identified for" in a sentence?

While the phrasing "it is identified for" is awkward, it can be improved by specifying what it's identified as or what it's identified for. For example, use alternatives like "it is "recognized as"", "it is "designated as"", or "it is "earmarked for"" depending on the intended meaning.

What are some alternatives to "it is identified for" that sound more natural?

More natural-sounding alternatives include "it is "known as"", "it is "classified as"", or "it is "regarded as"". The best choice depends on the context and the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is it better to use "identified as" or "identified for"?

"Identified as" is generally preferred because it directly states the classification or role. "Identified for" is often vague. For example, "it is identified as a key factor" is clearer than "it is identified for its key factor capabilities".

When is it appropriate to use the passive voice with "identified"?

The passive voice with "identified" is suitable when the identifier is more important than the actor. For instance, "the gene was "identified through" a genome-wide association study" emphasizes the discovery, not necessarily the researchers.