Mr. Sutton framed his challenge by referring to Chief Justice John Marshall's famous declaration in Marbury v. Madison, in 1803, that "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is".
The starting point for most discussions of judicial supremacy is Marbury v. Madison, the 1803 decision in which Chief Justice John Marshall wrote that "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is".
JAMES HABER Wayland, Mass., July 3, 2012 Ever since Marbury v. Madison the Supreme Court has aggrandized itself by fabricating the power of judicial review, declaring that "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is".
(Could the dream of expanded health care die at the hands of a Kennedy?) Scalia, Roberts, Thomas and the insufferable Samuel Alito were nurtured in the conservative Federalist Society, which asserts that "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be".
Chief Justice John Marshall stated long ago in 1803 that "it is emphatically the providence of the judicial department to state what the law is".
But "reflexive awareness"—often termed "self-awareness" (even though for Buddhists it is emphatically not an awareness of a self and its states)—will not get us all the way to internalism about justification either.
Ugly it is emphatically not.
It is emphatically not a car.
It is emphatically not the way forward.
– it is emphatically not for children.
It is emphatically a theater piece.
