it is cheap to implement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it is cheap to implement" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the cost-effectiveness of a particular solution, method, or technology in a project or context. Example: "After evaluating several options, we found that it is cheap to implement the new software system compared to the alternatives."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It is cheap to implement, but suffers as much as from to  dB in bit error rate (BER) performance [6].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

"Vaccination does not prompt protest, so it is cheaper to implement than culling," said Prof Woodroffe, who was a key member of the team that spent 10 years and £50m testing badger culling before concluding that culling could "make no meaningful contribution" to reducing bovine tuberculosis (TB).

The Guardian

Logistically, approval voting is cheap to implement, as it can be used on existing voting machines.

Huffington Post

Hiding attacks are cheap to implement and the primary weakness of SL2013.

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

Therefore, there is a need to find additional effective and scalable interventions that are cheap to implement and which can improve physical activity level in COPD patients [ 9].

European Respiratory Journal

Alternatively, if the workload is less than 5216 consultations it would be cheaper to implement the service using the organisations existing email system.

BMC Health Services Research

In implementing interventions such as reported here involves some cost but the cost of this intervention should not be over exaggerated because in the long run it may be cheaper to implement these activities to diagnose and treat patients early as outpatient than to receive them late and keep them on admission, which may require surgical interventions in some cases.

BMC Public Health

With respect to cost efficiency, colorful packages seem more promising because they are cheaper to implement than extra gifts.

Business Research

It's cheap to produce it therapeutically.

BBC

In short, it's cheap to produce.

Forbes

Unlike some of the F.C.C.'s other initiatives, which critics oppose as being too expensive and cumbersome, video description is relatively cheap to implement.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting a solution, use "it is cheap to implement" to underscore the financial benefits, particularly when compared to more complex or costly alternatives. This can be especially persuasive when budget constraints are a concern.

Common error

Avoid using "it is cheap to implement" without providing context about the benefits or trade-offs. Simply stating that something is cheap may imply low quality or insufficient functionality. Always balance the cost advantage with a clear explanation of the value it provides.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it is cheap to implement" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, describing the subject's characteristic of being inexpensive to put into action. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

37%

Formal & Business

26%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it is cheap to implement" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase for emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of a solution. Ludwig examples and AI analysis confirm its validity and versatility across various contexts, particularly in science, news, and business. While it's crucial to highlight cost benefits, remember to provide sufficient context to avoid the impression of low quality. Consider alternatives like ""it is cost-effective to apply"" for a subtle variation. Overall, the phrase is a valuable tool for advocating budget-friendly solutions effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it's cost-effective to apply

Emphasizes the favorable balance between cost and benefit of implementing something.

it's inexpensive to put into practice

Focuses on the low monetary cost of making something operational.

it's affordable to execute

Highlights the manageability of the implementation expenses.

it's economical to introduce

Suggests that the implementation is budget-friendly and resource-saving.

it is simple and low-cost to deploy

Combines ease of use with the advantage of being inexpensive.

it's budget-friendly to set up

Emphasizes that the setup process doesn't require a large investment.

it's financially viable to operationalize

Indicates that the implementation makes good financial sense.

it is easy and economical to realize

Suggests that the implementation requires minimal effort and is cost-effective.

it's a low- затраты implementation

Highlights that implementing involves minimal expenses.

it is minimally expensive to enact

Stresses the low level of expenditure needed to make something a reality.

FAQs

What does "it is cheap to implement" mean?

It means that a particular solution, method, or technology can be put into practice without requiring a large amount of money or resources.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "it is cheap to implement"?

It's appropriate when you want to emphasize the cost-effectiveness of a solution, especially in comparison to other more expensive options. Use it when the low cost is a significant advantage.

What are some alternatives to saying "it is cheap to implement"?

You can use alternatives like "it is cost-effective to apply", "it's inexpensive to put into practice", or "it's affordable to execute" depending on the context.

Is "it is cheap to implement" grammatically correct?

Yes, "it is cheap to implement" is grammatically correct and widely used in both formal and informal contexts, as Ludwig AI confirms.