The sentence 'It is answerable' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something is able to be answered, replied to, or explained. For example: "The question of why people make unhealthy lifestyle choices is answerable."
If America has divine sanction, as Mormons believe, it follows that American foreign policy has divine sanction too, and that it is answerable to its own (ie God's) rules, not those of other, by definition lesser and less blessed, nations.
The disadvantage is that it is answerable neither to shareholders nor, directly, to the Treasury.
He added: "The IOC itself needs dramatic reform so that it is answerable to somebody".
The Home Office, he added, should "take political responsibility for the outcome where it is answerable to the electorate".
It is answerable to no one; it is trained in tactics which have been released to no one, but which include the deliberate maiming and injuring of innocent persons to disperse them, in complete violation of the law".
It is answerable to experiential facts and is not constitutively self-fulfilling.
"I cannot prove it because the Police Department investigates itself, quite as though it were answerable only to itself.
What is most unfortunate about the President's lack of public engagement in the argument for force is that the objections to it are answerable.
County Comptroller Howard S. Weitzman, referring to the "vertical" grouping of the agencies in the county's organization chart, testified, "The evidence is overwhelming that the entire vertical has been mismanaged" and operated "as if it were answerable to no one and exempt from county policies and procedures".
However, even if it were answerable this question would not alter the fact that if we want to know how globalization affects SDH by way of marketizing domestic social and economic policy, then research on structural adjustment is valuable independent of specific historical connections between lender conditionalities and policy responses.
Strict liability statutes are proliferating the world over and survive alongside judge-made rules such as that enunciated by the English decision of Ryland v. Fletcher (1868), which held that anyone who in the course of "non-natural" use of his land accumulates thereon for his own purposes anything likely to do mischief if it escapes is answerable for all direct damage thereby caused.
