it intended to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it intended to" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "it is intended to" or "it was intended to," depending on the context. Example: "The new policy is intended to improve employee satisfaction and productivity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Biglari Holdings vaguely said it intended to evaluate its investment on a continuing basis.

The New York Times

It intended to base its worldwide headquarters for tax purposes in London.

Independent

Nike added that it intended to focus on its mainstay offerings.

The New York Times

It also said it intended to eventually realize half of its sales beyond China's borders.

The New York Times

Nor is it intended to be.

The New York Times

Nor is it intended to do so.

The New York Times

Whom is it intended to serve?

The New York Times

Hercules Offshore said it intended to cooperate with the investigations.

The New York Times

Still, SCA said it intended to do just that.

The New York Times

It intended to be Big, no regular fire.

The New York Times

Accell said it intended to keep looking for acquisition possibilities.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use a grammatically correct form such as "it was intended to" or "it is intended to" depending on the tense you need. Make sure the subject agrees with the verb.

Common error

Avoid using "it intended to" as it lacks the necessary auxiliary verb. Instead, use "it was intended to" for past tense or "it is intended to" for present tense.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it intended to" functions as part of a clause expressing purpose or intention. However, it is grammatically incomplete without an auxiliary verb. Ludwig provides examples that demonstrate its intended usage, but also highlights its grammatical incorrectness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Science

11%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "it intended to" appears frequently in various sources, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig advises using the correct forms, "it was intended to" or "it is intended to", depending on the intended tense. The phrase is used to express purpose or planned action across different registers, predominantly in news and media. Though common, it's essential to prioritize grammatical accuracy and use appropriate alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was intended to

Changes the tense to past and adds the auxiliary verb 'was' for correct grammatical structure.

it is intended to

Changes the tense to present and adds the auxiliary verb 'is' for correct grammatical structure.

it aims to

Replaces "intended to" with a more concise and grammatically sound alternative.

it planned to

Uses a different verb with a similar meaning to indicate a prior plan.

it purposed to

Employs a slightly more formal verb to convey the original intent.

it set out to

Replaces "intended to" with a phrasal verb indicating a specific goal or mission.

its intention was to

Transforms the phrase to use a noun form of "intend" followed by "was to".

it had the purpose of

Restructures the sentence to focus on the purpose behind the action.

the goal was to

Changes the subject to 'the goal' to emphasize the intended outcome.

it was designed to

Focuses on the design aspect as the reason for intent.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "it intended to"?

The grammatically correct ways to express the same idea are "it was intended to" (past tense) or "it is intended to" (present tense). For instance, "The project "it was intended to" improve efficiency".

What are some alternatives to "it intended to"?

Besides the corrected forms, you can use alternatives like "it aims to", "it planned to", or "the purpose was to" depending on the specific context.

How does the meaning change when using "it is intended to" versus "it was intended to"?

Using "it is intended to" implies a present or future intention, while "it was intended to" indicates a past intention. For example, "The software "it is intended to" simplify the process" (present/future), versus "The original design "it was intended to" reduce costs" (past).

Is "it intended to" ever correct?

No, "it intended to" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It requires an auxiliary verb such as "is" or "was" to form a complete and correct sentence. Ludwig AI points out that it should be "it is intended to" or "it was intended to".