it filled with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it filled with" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be missing a subject or an object to complete the thought. Example: "The room was filled with laughter."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He bought the house for twelve and a half million, and keeps it filled with the furniture, down to the mattress, of its previous occupant, Jennifer Lopez.

The New Yorker

In 60 seconds it filled with water.

The New York Times

That glass was it filled with alcohol, water, or light.

The New Yorker

Eventually it filled with families, lower and middle class.

The New York Times - Sports

Sims looked inside the boat and saw it filled with trochus.

The New York Times - Magazine

It filled with six and a half feet of water anyway.

The New York Times - Food

"I imagined it filled with a cast of people and costumes and lights," she said.

The New Yorker

The desk has a pint glass on it, filled with water.

Independent

When she visits the flat she finds it filled with dirt.

The New Yorker

Abandoned in 1970, it filled with water to form a vast lake.

The Guardian - Books

As it filled with rallygoers and counterprotesters, the mix quickly became volatile.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it filled with", ensure a subject is explicitly stated to create a grammatically sound sentence. For example, rewrite "it filled with water" as "the container filled with water".

Common error

Avoid using "it filled with" without a clear subject. This can lead to ambiguity and grammatical errors. Always specify what "it" refers to.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it filled with" typically functions as part of a clause describing a state or condition. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically incorrect in standard written English, as it often requires a subject or auxiliary verb to be complete.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Wiki

23%

Science

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "it filled with" is commonly found, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect due to its lack of a clear subject or auxiliary verb. To ensure grammatical correctness, explicitly state the subject (e.g., "the room filled with smoke") or use the passive voice ("it was filled with smoke"). Although prevalent in informal contexts and news media, refining this phrase is crucial for formal writing. Consider using alternatives such as "it became full of" or "it overflowed with" for enhanced clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it became full of

Emphasizes the process of becoming full, highlighting a change in state.

it was replete with

Suggests abundance and completeness, indicating a high degree of fullness.

it overflowed with

Implies an excess, going beyond the capacity to hold something.

it teemed with

Focuses on the presence of numerous items or entities within the space.

it was abundant in

Highlights the plentiful nature of something within the space.

it was saturated with

Suggests a deep permeation or infusion of something.

it brimmed with

Indicates fullness to the point of almost overflowing, emphasizing the upper limit.

it was laden with

Focuses on the weight or burden of what fills the space.

it was flush with

Implies a surface-level filling, often suggesting wealth or prosperity.

it swelled with

Suggests an increase in size due to being filled, often with emotion or pride.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "it filled with"?

Ensure the sentence includes a subject performing the action. For example, instead of "it filled with water", say "the glass filled with water" or "the tank was filled with water".

What are some alternatives to "it filled with"?

Consider using phrases like "it became full of", "it was replete with", or "it overflowed with" to add variety and clarity to your writing.

Is "it filled with" grammatically correct?

No, "it filled with" is grammatically incorrect. It requires a subject to clarify what is performing the action of filling. The passive voice (e.g., "it was filled with") is often more appropriate.

What is the difference between "it filled with" and "it was filled with"?

"It filled with" is missing an auxiliary verb and a subject, making it grammatically incomplete. "It was filled with" is the passive voice and is grammatically correct, indicating that something else caused the filling.