it equated to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it equated to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that one thing is equal to or corresponds to another in value, meaning, or significance. Example: "In terms of effort, his contribution equated to that of the entire team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

Wood has been warned over the incident, but the match citing commissioner, Maurizio Vancini, decided that it equated to a yellow card, meaning he will be available for selection for Saturday's encounter with the unbeaten Wallabies.

Independent

At the time, it equated to about £180m.

BBC

Then again, it equated to about what Aniston earned per episode on Friends.

Forbes

The Conservative-controlled council said it equated to one in six staff and about a third would be senior managers.

BBC

Hospital management said talks had been held with primary care trust NHS Suffolk about the funding but denied it equated to a bail out.

BBC

Put another way it equated to the total GDP of Kuwait - some $120.3 billion in 2017 last year, which seems incredible.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

"It equates to about £5,000 per match.

The Guardian - Sport

It equates to return on equity of just below 3 percent.

The New York Times

It equates to around £16.5bn in today's money.

The Guardian

At £20 million per hour it equates to almost £335,000 per minute.

Independent

But how does it equate to other famous (or infamous) traders gone rogue through the years?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it equated to" when you want to clearly state that two things are of equal value or significance. For example, "The cost of the project it equated to the company's annual revenue."

Common error

Avoid using "it equated to" when you intend to express similarity or resemblance, but not direct equality. In such cases, consider using phrases like "it was similar to" or "it resembled".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it equated to" functions as a linking phrase indicating equality or equivalence between two subjects. According to Ludwig, this usage is grammatically sound and appears in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

36%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

HuffPost

4%

Los Angeles Times

4%

Forbes

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it equated to" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression for indicating equivalence or equality. According to Ludwig, its usage is valid across diverse contexts, primarily in News & Media and Science. When writing, remember that it's best employed to show something is of equal value or significance. As Ludwig AI states, it's suitable for neutral registers. Be mindful of using it only when direct equivalence is intended, to avoid misrepresenting the relationship between the subjects. Understanding these nuances will help you effectively incorporate the expression in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was equal to

Expresses direct equality in value or amount.

it was equivalent to

Highlights functional or practical equivalence.

it amounted to

Implies a cumulative result or total.

it corresponded to

Suggests a matching or analogous relationship.

it represented

Focuses on symbolic or indicative meaning.

it signified

Emphasizes the meaning or implication.

it was comparable to

Highlights similarities for the purpose of comparison.

it translated to

Indicates a conversion or adaptation to a different form.

it boiled down to

Implies a simplification or core essence.

it was tantamount to

Suggests near equivalence, often in a negative context.

FAQs

How can I use "it equated to" in a sentence?

Use "it equated to" to show that something is equal or equivalent to something else. For example, "Her contribution it equated to the success of the project."

What can I say instead of "it equated to"?

You can use alternatives like "it was equal to", "it was equivalent to", or "it amounted to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "it equated to" or "it equates to"?

"It equated to" is past tense, while "it equates to" is present tense. Use "it equated to" when describing something that happened in the past and "it equates to" when describing something that happens regularly or is generally true.

What's the difference between "it equated to" and "it contributed to"?

"It equated to" implies that something was equal in value or effect, while "it contributed to" implies that something was a factor in achieving a result. "It equated to" suggests equivalence, while "it contributed to" suggests influence.