it earmarked for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it earmarked for" is not correct as it is missing a verb.
It should be "it is earmarked for" or "it was earmarked for." You can use it when indicating that something has been designated or set aside for a specific purpose or recipient. Example: "The funds were earmarked for community development projects."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

The CNC has €522m ($682m) to spend in 2005, almost half of it earmarked for cinema.

The Economist

They have money in three mutual funds, all of it earmarked for their down payment.

The New York Times

Most of whose who were't putting the cash in savings accounts had it earmarked for family obligations.

The New Yorker

Last year the firm set aside $15.38 billion for pay, down 5 percent from the $16.19 billion it earmarked for compensation in 2009.

The New York Times

The rain forest event, sponsored by Revlon this year, took in some $3 million, according to Sting, much of it earmarked for the rescue of the Amazonian jungle.

The New York Times

For the 2002 fiscal year, New Jersey received about $100 million in one type of federal aid for child welfare, about a quarter of it earmarked for adoption.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

39 human-written examples

CAA announced that it would use funds it had earmarked for the bash to help establish a legal defense fund, The Hollywood Reporter first reported Monday.

Huffington Post

Doing this makes it harder for you to spend the money and you'll feel reticent to reduce it when you know it's earmarked for your emergency fund.

WikiHow

As it had poor public transport integration and no rail provision, it was earmarked for a potential Metrolink line as early as 1986 and legal authority to construct the line through the Quays was acquired in 1990.

Wikipedia

The Italian Treasury said it had priced 1.25 billion euros of five-year bonds, the maximum it had earmarked for the sale, with a gross yield of 4.93 percent, up from 3.9 percent at an auction in June.

The New York Times

If Assemblyman Lento's money is no good when it's earmarked for honoring some hard-working Catholic school kid from Brooklyn, clearly it has no place in the basket at mass.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always include an auxiliary verb such as "is" or "was" before "earmarked" to ensure grammatical correctness when using the phrase to indicate that something has been designated for a specific purpose. For example, use "it is earmarked for" or "it was earmarked for."

Common error

Avoid using "it earmarked for" without an auxiliary verb. This omission results in a grammatically incorrect phrase. Always include "is" or "was" to ensure clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it earmarked for" functions as an incomplete adjectival phrase, failing to correctly modify a noun or pronoun due to the missing auxiliary verb. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase requires an auxiliary verb to be grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it earmarked for" is grammatically incorrect due to the absence of a necessary auxiliary verb. As Ludwig AI points out, adding "is" or "was" corrects the phrase, making it suitable for various contexts. Alternatives like "it is designated for" or "it is allocated for" can also be used. Always ensure grammatical correctness to maintain clarity and credibility in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was earmarked for

Adds the past tense auxiliary verb "was" to make the phrase grammatically correct, indicating a past designation.

it is earmarked for

Adds the present tense auxiliary verb "is" to make the phrase grammatically correct, indicating a current designation.

it designated for

Replaces "earmarked" with "designated", maintaining the meaning of assigning something for a specific purpose.

it allocated for

Replaces "earmarked" with "allocated", indicating a formal distribution of resources.

it's intended for

Uses "intended for" as an alternative to indicate the planned use of something.

it's reserved for

Employs "reserved for" to suggest that something is set aside and protected for a specific use.

funds allocated for it

Reorders the phrase and adds "funds" to specify that money is being designated.

resources set aside for it

Emphasizes the setting aside of resources for a particular purpose.

money earmarked for it

Specifies that "money" is designated for something, clarifying the type of resource.

that was saved for

Uses a past form of the verb save, suggesting an amount saved for a certain thing.

FAQs

How should I correctly use "it earmarked for" in a sentence?

The phrase "it earmarked for" is grammatically incomplete. You should use "it is earmarked for" or "it was earmarked for" to correctly indicate that something is designated for a specific purpose. For example, "The budget is earmarked for education."

What phrases are similar in meaning to "it is earmarked for"?

Similar phrases include "it is designated for", "it is allocated for", or "it is intended for". These alternatives also convey the idea of assigning something for a specific use.

Is "it earmarked for" grammatically correct?

No, "it earmarked for" is grammatically incorrect. It requires an auxiliary verb such as "is" or "was" to form a complete and correct sentence. The correct forms are "it is earmarked for" (present tense) and "it was earmarked for" (past tense).

How does using "it is earmarked for" differ from "it earmarked for"?

Using "it is earmarked for" provides a complete and grammatically correct statement indicating that something is currently designated for a specific purpose. The phrase "it earmarked for", without the auxiliary verb, is grammatically incorrect and unclear.