Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
WASHINGTON -- If an organization is accused of a crime but there's no evidence it committed that crime, should the organization still be punished for its imaginary crime?
Similar(57)
"Whatever horrible, senseless, inexcusable thing Lemrick Nelson did to Yankel Rosenbaum, whatever crime he committed that night, it wasn't this crime".
It's the gusto and flair with which it commits to that absurdity that makes it so exciting.
Just because it seems daunting to commit that kind of time doesn't mean you should quit.
Oh, it will be tough to commit that deed, as justifiable and as merciful as it may be, as long as Bud Selig is baseball commissioner.
If you're going to accuse someone of doing something wrong, it's best not to commit that crime yourself while making the accusation.
If people really believe that the government could default on its debts or otherwise not make payments to which it is committed, that introduces a huge element of uncertainty into many economic calculations.
First Data disclosed the settlement, without admitting or denying that it committed violations, in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Tata was sufficiently convinced by the five-year plan drawn up by JLR that it committed itself to backing it without any major changes.
The government still denies accusations that it committed war crimes.
ExxonMobil in the accord denies that it committed any violations or is liable for any penalties.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com