Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
It asks "whether people or bodies who have an economic interest in a business, but who cannot be constructively involved with the management of that business by virtue of anonymity, remoteness or the nature of their interest should expect to enjoy similar rights vis-à-vis that business as others who are engaged shareholders in the business".
It asks whether planners might have to become more visible, entrepreneurial and trans-disciplinary.
It asks whether copyright law understands authorship as other creativity studies fields do.
Moreover, it asks whether management of water use rather than water supply can be part of mitigating salt intrusion.
It asks whether success is down to hard work or forces beyond citizens' control.
It asks whether playing out attacks increases rather than diminishes their potency.
So it asks whether art can infiltrate society, for instance – a perfectly good if archaic question.
It asks whether, in a rural African setting, it is possible to implement a scientifically rigorous evaluation without compromising acceptability of the trial to the community.
It asks whether people can learn to care for and love each other again, establish right from wrong – be human.
It asks whether the contents of a woman's head need be regarded as any different to those of a man.
It asks whether, consequently, the abovementioned provisions preclude national legislation which allocates the rights in question by operation of law exclusively to the producer of the work.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com