Sentence examples for it argues that while from inspiring English sources

It argues that while the preclearance rule was justified when the country, especially the South, was ending legal segregation, it is no longer needed.

It argues that while there are obvious reasons to fear that the gradual erosion of freedom over the last decade will continue or accelerate because angry people require policing, pacifying and distracting there are also reasons to be optimistic.

The Bank does not believe these "zombie firms", as they are sometimes known, are jeopardising financial stability, and it argues that while propping up firms instead of letting them go bust could lead to a misallocation of resources across the economy, it is unlikely to be the explanation for much of the collapse in productivity in the UK since the crisis.

It argues that, while public confidence matters, the public must also do their part in reporting crime, co-operating in investigations, and testifying in court.

It argues that, while the residential location and neighbourhood remain significant, urban segregation needs to be understood and examined in terms of everyday activities, social networks and mobility within the context of broader social and political-economic processes.

It argues that while the country appears to have a strong institutional design for public participation, there is a decisively low level of institutionalization of actual participatory processes that could not achieve substantive autonomy from power structures.

Richard Posner, in his new book, "Catastrophe: Risk and Response," argues that, while it may be expensive to prepare for rare events with dire consequences — a tsunami, an earth-bound asteroid — it is the reasonable thing to do.

And it argued that while the footbaths may benefit Muslim students, they will be available to others, like lacrosse players who want to wash their feet.

It argues that Kagan, while serving as solicitor general, had sufficient involvement with and investment in the passage of the law as to trigger two standards for judicial recusal under federal law.

While it argues that the State Department, under her leadership, inadequately protected its staff in Benghazi, its criticism focused more broadly on the Obama administration.

"It argues that it cannot make peace while there is violence, and when there is no violence it sees little reason to make peace".