Its 7,000 people were English and Dutch merchants and west African slaves; it was xenophobic and aggressively pious; it was loyalist in its politics and provincial in its culture; and everybody knew everybody else's business.
The Northern League denies it is xenophobic, insisting it is only opposed to illegal immigration.
Diane Abbott said that it was xenophobic to bring up the issue.
During the war, it was xenophobic and Pétainist, like most papers other than the clandestine press; its publisher, Horace de Carbuccia, took risks in publishing Némirovsky's stories under a pseudonym, when Jewish writers were forbidden to publish (and she was her family's sole breadwinner).
It is also usually repressive towards national or social minorities; it is xenophobic, with degrees of anti-Semitism and hatred against LGBT people.
It is xenophobic, calling for a ban on Muslim immigration, ALL Muslim immigration (there are many Muslims coming from non conflict zones, like say, India, who are zero threat to our safety; in fact, all but a small fraction of immigrants from anywhere are a threat to our safety).
On the Web site of the National Review, Mark Krikorian wrote, "You can hear the objections now: It would be xenophobic, it might stigmatize West Africans, those countries will object to our State Department that they're being discriminated against".
"He's xenophobic, he's an alcoholic, but he also understands some profound stuff about class.
Undocumented Muslim youth like Islam have been living for months under a government that can be as Islamophobic as it often is xenophobic.
