It was argued, as it is today, that if societies accept the standard fare of neoclassical economics – deregulation, flexible labour markets, reducing government intervention, greater competition – then entire populations would be better off.
It is argued, as most lung cancer patients are smokers and therefore carry a higher risk of smoking-related mortalities, that they are not comparable to a population where the majority are likely to be non-smokers.
While population-based screening mammography is implemented in many affluent western countries, it is argued as not being cost-effective in most of Asia (Woo et al, 2007; Okonkwo et al, 2008; Kang et al, 2013) and had been offered only in high-income countries including Japan since 1987, Korea since 1999, and Singapore since 2003 (Kwong et al, 2008; Lim et al, 2010).
It is argued, as most lung cancer patients are smokers and therefore carry a higher risk of many other diseases, that they are not comparable to a population where the majority are likely to be non-smokers (Phillips et al, 2002).
It therefore simply cannot be argued, as has been done by Dennett et al. (2009), that debunking the current tree of life images feeds into creationist thought.
It's argued that, as child rearing only takes up a fraction of a woman's life, breasts must be some function other than milk supply.
It is argued that as long as price and quality are the only important performance criteria, STS practices have little to offer and their contributions will be only at the job level.
It was argued that as long as the two structures were viewed simultaneously, the visual juxtaposition would be detrimental to the Cathedral.
It was argued that, as long as the uptake of named testing by pregnant women and STI clinic users remains high (above 90%) then a national programme of UAT was not thought to be necessary.
