The phrase "issues to be determined" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to topics that need to be discussed or resolved. For example: "We need to address several issues to be determined before we can move forward with the project."
The status of Jerusalem — sacred to all three Abrahamic faiths — has long been one of the "final status" issues to be determined as part of the peace process.
The status of Jerusalem sacred to all three Abrahamic faiths—has long been one of the "final status" issues to be determined as part of the peace process.
Any aggrieved person with respect to the issues to be determined in a civil action under this subsection may intervene as of right in that civil action.
Their objection was overruled and respondents then asked the examiner to certify to the Commission the request to define the issues to be determined on the petition for rehearig and to instruct its representatives that no evidence in furtherance of the orders of January 6 , 1936 and January 26 , 1937 be introduced.
Because the trial court's error in failing to instruct on comparative fault does not affect the jury's finding that Zezulka's negligence was a proximate cause of Hickey's injury, the issues to be determined on the retrial ordered are limited to the amount of damages and comparative fault; the range of appropriate proof within these parameters is for the trial court to determine.
Thus, a defendant under English law may issue a notice called a third-party notice containing a statement of the nature of the claim made by him against a third party, relevant to the original subject matter of the action or of issues to be determined.
3. What is the precise issue to be determined in a Daubert hearing?
"The issue to be determined is whether polishing the hallway floors would be for cosmetic or maintenance purposes".
"This is not an issue to be determined at the diocesan or parish level, but has already been decided for the Roman Catholic Church throughout the world by Vatican authority".
Hence there was a factual issue to be determined at the outset, unlike the present case, where there is no conflict between the trial testimony and the subsequent matter brought forward by the Government as bearing on credibility.
This, in view of the nature of the issue to be determined, cannot be said to give rise to a substantial difference in right, or to any inequality within the meaning of the constitutional provision.
