issues at stake

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "issues at stake" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to something that is threatened by a certain course of action. For example, "We must carefully weigh the issues at stake before making a decision on this matter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"There are these deep issues at stake".

The New York Times - Health

The issues at stake are historic.

The Guardian - Opinion

There are two issues at stake.

The Guardian

But there are bigger issues at stake.

The Guardian - Opinion

What are the key issues at stake?

The Washington Post

These are some of the issues at stake.

Ecological Economics

There are also huge issues at stake in these elections.

The Guardian

"The issues at stake are bigger than politics," Obama said.

The Guardian

There are even bigger issues at stake, though.

The Guardian - Business

But, beneath the bitchiness, there are real issues at stake.

The Guardian

No one doubts that there are serious issues at stake.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "issues at stake", clearly define what those issues are to ensure your audience understands the potential impact or consequences.

Common error

Avoid using "issues at stake" without specifying what those issues are. Readers need context to understand the importance of the situation. For example, instead of saying "There are issues at stake", specify "There are environmental and economic issues at stake."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "issues at stake" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject complement or object of a sentence. It identifies the crucial concerns or matters that are at risk or under consideration in a particular situation. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage and grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Science

22%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "issues at stake" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to highlight the importance and potential consequences of a situation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's versatile and appears in diverse contexts, including news, science, and academia. The key is to clearly define what those "issues at stake" are to ensure effective communication. Remember to avoid vagueness and provide context, and you'll be well on your way to using this phrase effectively. Consider alternatives like ""stakes involved"" or "matters in question" for slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stakes involved

Similar meaning, but puts greater emphasis on what could be won or lost.

matters in question

Focuses on the specific items or topics that are being discussed or decided upon.

points at issue

Highlights the particular disagreements or uncertainties that need to be resolved.

key considerations

Highlights the most important factors or aspects that need to be taken into account.

interests involved

Emphasizes the parties or entities that have something to gain or lose.

risks involved

Highlights the potential dangers or negative effects that could occur.

factors under consideration

Stresses the elements that are being taken into account when making a decision.

concerns to address

Highlights the problems or worries that need to be dealt with.

potential consequences

Focuses on the possible outcomes that could result from a particular action or decision.

underlying questions

Focuses on the fundamental inquiries or puzzles that need to be answered.

FAQs

How can I use "issues at stake" in a sentence?

You can use "issues at stake" to highlight the potential consequences or risks involved in a situation. For instance, "The "stakes involved" in this decision are incredibly high, with significant environmental and economic implications." or, "When negotiating, it's crucial to understand the "points at issue" and their potential impact."

What are some alternative phrases to "issues at stake"?

Alternatives include ""stakes involved"", "matters in question", "interests involved", or "potential consequences". The best choice depends on the specific context and what you want to emphasize.

Is it better to use "issues at stake" or "stakes at issue"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "issues at stake" is more common. "Stakes at issue" can sound slightly more formal or emphatic, but is used more rarely.

How can I clearly define the "issues at stake" in my writing?

Be specific and provide context. Instead of just stating that "issues at stake" are present, elaborate on what those issues are and why they are important. For example, "The potential consequences of this policy include job losses, environmental damage, and increased healthcare costs."