issued in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "issued in" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the context or location where something was officially released or published. Example: "The report was issued in New York City last week."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

ruling was issued in Geneva.

The New York Times

When it is issued in Vietnam.

The Economist

A report was issued in June.

The New Yorker

Voting materials must be issued in Flemish.

The New York Times

These were issued in 1877.

The New Yorker

Thus, Patent 1 was issued in 1837.

The New York Times

The fatwa was issued in February.

The New York Times

(It was first issued in 1983).

The New York Times

That charge was issued in Cologne on Friday.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

80% of mortgages are still issued in-person.

TechCrunch

The book was re-issued in 1984.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "issued in", ensure that the location specified is relevant and adds meaningful context to the statement. Be precise about the place; use specific cities or regions instead of just countries if possible.

Common error

Avoid using "issued in" when referring to events that merely occurred in a place, rather than being officially released or sanctioned there. For instance, don't say "the accident was issued in Paris"; instead, use "the accident occurred in Paris".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "issued in" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun. It specifies the place where something was officially released or made available. Ludwig examples show it frequently used with reports, licenses, and publications.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "issued in" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to specify the location of an official release or publication, as confirmed by Ludwig. It's grammatically correct and widely used across diverse contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias. While alternatives like "released in" or "published in" exist, "issued in" often implies a formal or authoritative origin. Remember to use it accurately, focusing on official releases rather than general occurrences. Ludwig examples demonstrate its effectiveness in providing meaningful context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

released in

Emphasizes the act of making something available to the public in a particular location.

published in

Focuses on the formal act of making written material available in a specific place.

originated in

Highlights the place where something began or was created.

produced in

Emphasizes the location where something was manufactured or created.

distributed in

Focuses on the geographical area where something was made available.

unveiled in

Highlights the act of formally revealing or presenting something in a specific location.

launched in

Emphasizes the start or introduction of something new in a particular place.

introduced in

Focuses on bringing something new to a specific location or audience.

created in

Highlights the location where something was brought into existence.

established in

Emphasizes the founding or setting up of something in a specific location.

FAQs

How can I use "issued in" in a sentence?

Use "issued in" to specify the location where something such as a document, statement, or publication was officially released or made available. For example, "The press release was issued in London." You can also consider alternative phrases like "released in" or "published in".

What are some alternatives to "issued in"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "released in", "published in", or "originated in". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "the report issued in" or "the report was issued in"?

While "the report issued in" can function as a reduced relative clause, "the report was issued in" is generally clearer and more grammatically explicit. Using the passive voice construction is usually preferred in formal writing.

What's the difference between "issued in" and "released in"?

"Issued in" typically implies an official or formal release, often by an authority. "Released in" can be more general, referring to making something available to the public, regardless of the level of formality. Both phrases specify a location.