But for now it seems Mr. Calvin is more preoccupied with formal and technical issues of painting.
When speaking about what New York media are calling "Bridgegate" at a news conference in December, Christie accused the press of obsessing about the issue to paint him in a bad light.
The issue of lead paint has been a potent one since last July, when the State Court of Appeals struck down the city's four-year-old law on cleaning up lead paint.
But two papers in tomorrow's issue of Nature paint an entirely different portrait.
Some accounts of the issue tend to paint a picture of current adolescents and post-adolescents as "pornified" youth (Paul, 2005) or "Generation XXX" (Carroll et al., 2008), implying that adolescents may constitute the group in which SEIM use is the highest.
Discussions of this issue frequently paint a somewhat idealized picture of the patriotism and competence of full-time government employees, but there are reasonable grounds to be wary of inserting a profit motive into intelligence activities.
It followed an attack on another piece, which targeted the issue of government surveillance painted next to a phonebox near GCHQ in Cheltenham.
For example, there were issues raised about the size of the room; number of paint colors, presence of molding or baseboard; use of a brush or roller; and need to paint the wall, ceiling and/or trim.
This does not mean — as one writer recently scoffed — that we "poll people at both extremes of any issue, then paint a line down the middle and point to it as reality".
In the sort of journalism I am interested in practicing here, I want my reporters to reject the false idea that you simply poll people at both extremes of any issue, then paint a line down the middle and point to it as reality.
