issue has been joined

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "issue has been joined" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to indicate that the parties involved have presented their respective claims and defenses, and the matter is now ready for trial or further proceedings. Example: "Once the issue has been joined, the court will schedule a hearing to address the arguments presented by both sides."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The issue has been joined.

The New York Times

So, as the legal profession might say, the issue has been joined -- or, to throw in some more time-worn phrases, it's water under the bridge, the deed is done, the die is cast, and so on.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Those issues have been joined by performance issues related to Ford's new 1.6-liter and 2-liter EcoBoost turbocharged engines.

The New York Times

"I think we are at a stage where the issues have been joined, there has been a tremendous amount of discussion, it's time for us really to dig, to dig deep, and try to find solutions and try to be creative and try to compromise in a way that will work for everybody," Pash said Friday.

The New York Times - Sports

The one health issue that has been joined in the campaign, prescription drug coverage for the elderly, was hardly discussed eight years ago.

The New York Times

BP has opposed the drilling moratorium, but it has been joined by every other oil company on that issue.

Forbes

The debate has been joined".

The New York Times

"The great issue would have been joined if the ten men had only stood up and said whether or not they were Communists," he continued.

The New Yorker

A press release issued by the National Society for Human Rights said Mr Ellwood had been joined at the private meeting by Simon Collis, the British Ambassador, who stressed the importance of creating partnerships between human rights organisations in the two countries.

Independent

We had been joined by Taylor and another NOAA official, Tim Osborn, and were driving in Osborn's government-issue Suburban.

The New Yorker

Pre-service classroom teachers have been joined in this research.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "issue has been joined" to signal that a discussion or legal proceeding is ready to move forward because all sides have presented their arguments. It adds a tone of formality and readiness.

Common error

Avoid using "issue has been joined" in casual conversation. It sounds overly formal and stilted outside of legal or similarly structured debates.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "issue has been joined" functions as an idiomatic expression that signifies the commencement of a formal dispute or debate. As Ludwig AI confirms, this expression is grammatically correct, and the provided examples demonstrate its use in contexts where a matter is ready for trial or further discussion.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "issue has been joined" is a formal expression signifying the start of a debate or legal process. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for contexts requiring a formal tone. While it's not frequently used in everyday speech, it serves as a clear indicator that all preliminary arguments have been presented and the matter is ready for consideration. Alternatives like "the debate is underway" or "the matter is in dispute" may be more suitable for less formal settings. Predominantly found in news and media sources, it is important to reserve its usage for situations that call for a clear, formal declaration of a debate's commencement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the debate is underway

Focuses on the active state of the debate, rather than the formal establishment of the issue.

the question is now at issue

Highlights that a question is now under consideration, not necessarily in a formal debate.

the matter is in dispute

Highlights the disagreement about a specific matter, without necessarily implying formal commencement.

the matter is now up for debate

Similar to 'the question is at issue,' but with a slightly more active and less formalized connotation.

the point of contention is established

Focuses on identifying a specific point of disagreement, without emphasizing the debate's commencement.

the battle lines are drawn

Emphasizes the confrontational aspect of the issue, suggesting opposing sides are clearly defined.

the disagreement is now formalized

Highlights the formalizing of a disagreement, but does not necessarily imply an active debate.

the controversy has begun

Indicates the start of a public disagreement or debate, broader than a formal joining of issues.

the conflict has started

Indicates the initiation of conflict, which may be broader than a formally joined issue.

the stage is set for debate

Implies preparation for a debate, rather than its formal initiation.

FAQs

What does "issue has been joined" mean?

The phrase "issue has been joined" means that all parties involved in a dispute or debate have presented their arguments, and the matter is now ready for consideration or trial.

When is it appropriate to use "issue has been joined"?

It's appropriate to use "issue has been joined" in legal, political, or formal debate contexts when all arguments have been presented and a decision or action is pending.

What can I say instead of "issue has been joined"?

You can use alternatives like "the debate is underway", "the matter is in dispute", or "the battle lines are drawn" depending on the context.

Is "issue has been joined" commonly used in everyday conversation?

No, "issue has been joined" is not commonly used in everyday conversation due to its formal and somewhat archaic tone. It's more suitable for formal settings like legal or political discussions.