Experience is not convertible.
Given that China's own currency is not convertible, it is unclear how this would work in practice.
The biggest problem in merging the two classes of shares is that the yuan is not convertible.
Finally, if the predicate is not convertible and is not part of the definition, it is an accident of the subject.
Its predicate is not convertible with its subject, nor is it part of the definition; accordingly, it expresses only an accidental characteristic of man.
On the other hand, if the predicate is not convertible with the subject but is part of the definition, it is the genus or differentia of the subject, for a definition always consists of genus and differentia.
China's currency is not convertible and capital movements are highly restricted.
That would seem impossible at this moment, in part because the yuan, as China's money is informally known, is not convertible.
Aristotle considers the fallacy of consequent to be a special case of the fallacy of accident, observing that consequence is not convertible, i.e., "if \(A\) is, \(B\) necessarily is, men also fancy that, if \(B\) is, \(A\) necessarily is" (SR 5 169b3).
In other words, it is only an hypothesis in Einstein's (1905b) argument, and indeed in all derivations of E = mc2 in special relativity, that no "exotic matter" exists that is not convertible into energy (see Ehlers, Rindler, Penrose, (1965) for a discussion of this point).
