is worked for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is worked for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express that someone is employed by or supports a particular cause or organization, but the construction is awkward. Example: "She is worked for by a dedicated team of volunteers."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

The Guardian - Sport

Forbes

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

63rd over: England 181-5 (in reply to South Africa's 309; Bairstow 65, Prior 2) Tahir continues for now – there is bound to be one last burst from Steyn pretty soon – and is worked for a single by Bairstow.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"He is working for us".

The New York Times

It is working for me".

Independent

He is working for Mubarak".

The New Yorker

"All Nature is working for you.

The New Yorker

Tom Cruise's daughter is working for Katie Holmes.

Independent

It is working for Britain.

The Guardian

Democracy is working for them.

The New York Times

Johnson is working for free.

Forbes

He is working for $300 a month.

Forbes

It's worked for them before.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "is worked for" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives such as "is employed by" or "is used by" to convey the intended meaning.

Common error

The phrase "is worked for" can sound awkward because it misuses passive voice. Ensure that when using passive voice, the subject of the sentence is clearly receiving the action, not performing it. For example, instead of "he is worked for", write "he is employed by" or "he works for".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is worked for" typically attempts to describe an employment relationship or the beneficiary of an action. However, Ludwig AI indicates this construction is not grammatically correct in standard English, suggesting that it's an unconventional way to express that someone is employed by, or something is being done for, a particular entity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

The Guardian - Sport

15%

Forbes

15%

Less common in

Science

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is worked for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and its usage is rare. Ludwig AI confirms this, recommending alternative phrasing for clarity. When aiming to express employment or benefit, consider more direct and accepted phrases like "is employed by" or "works for". While it may occasionally appear in news or general media, its use in formal or academic writing should be avoided. Employing clearer alternatives enhances communication and ensures grammatical correctness. Using alternatives such as "is used by" is a better solution.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is employed by

Replaces a passive construction with a direct statement of employment.

is used by

Focuses on the utility or application of something rather than active labor.

is effective for

Shifts the emphasis to the result or benefit of an action or method.

is being utilized by

Similar to 'is used by', but highlights the ongoing nature of the process.

is beneficial to

Highlights the positive impact or advantage for a person or entity.

is in service of

Suggests a dedicated or purposeful action towards a specific goal.

is under contract with

Specifies a formal agreement for services rendered.

is on the payroll of

Emphasizes the financial aspect of being employed by someone.

is instrumental for

Highlights the critical role of someone or something in achieving a particular outcome.

is operated by

Implies a system or organization is managed or run by someone.

FAQs

What does "is worked for" mean?

The phrase "is worked for" is generally not considered standard English. It's often intended to mean "is employed by" or "works for", but the construction is awkward and can be confusing.

Which is correct, "is worked for" or "works for"?

"Works for" is the correct and more common way to express that someone is employed by a company or organization. "Is worked for" is not grammatically sound.

What can I say instead of "is worked for"?

Better alternatives include "is employed by", "works for", or "is in the service of" depending on the intended meaning.

How can I avoid using "is worked for" in a sentence?

Reframe your sentence to use active voice or use a more direct expression. For instance, instead of "The project is worked for by a team", say "A team works on the project" or "A team is dedicated to the project".