is very weak

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is very weak" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that lacks strength, effectiveness, or intensity in various contexts, such as arguments, performances, or physical objects. Example: "The evidence presented in the case is very weak, making it difficult to reach a solid conclusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

She is very weak.

The Guardian

"This bill is very weak".

The New York Times

But enforcement is very weak.

The Guardian

This report is very weak".

The New York Times

"Their army is very weak," he said.

The New York Times

Surprisingly, this dependence is very weak.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"He is very weak," Ghebrai said.

The Washington Post

"I think the no is very weak.

The Guardian

"The capitalist, democratic ideology is very weak".

The New York Times

"My eyesight is very weak," she confessed.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

I am very weak.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is very weak", consider the specific context to determine if a more precise synonym would be more impactful. For example, instead of "The argument is very weak", you might say "The argument is unconvincing" or "The argument is unsubstantiated".

Common error

Avoid using "very" excessively. While grammatically correct, overusing "very" can make your writing sound less sophisticated. Replace "is very weak" with a stronger adjective like "is frail" or "is feeble" to convey the meaning more directly.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is very weak" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the subject's state of lacking strength, power, or effectiveness. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct. Examples from Ludwig demonstrate its use across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is very weak" is a grammatically sound and common way to express a significant lack of strength or effectiveness. As affirmed by Ludwig, it is widely used across various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science and Encyclopedias. While versatile, writers should consider more specific synonyms for greater precision and avoid overusing "very" to maintain a sophisticated writing style. When a greater emphasis on weakness needs to be conveyed, the phrase works well.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is quite feeble

Replaces "very weak" with a synonym implying a lack of strength or energy.

is extremely fragile

Emphasizes the delicate and easily damaged nature of something.

is seriously flawed

Highlights significant imperfections or defects that undermine effectiveness.

is noticeably deficient

Indicates a clear and apparent lack of something essential or expected.

is severely compromised

Suggests that something has been weakened or damaged to a great extent.

lacks significant power

Focuses on the absence of influence or control.

offers limited resistance

Describes a minimal ability to withstand force or opposition.

shows considerable vulnerability

Highlights the susceptibility to harm or attack.

is barely adequate

Implies that something only meets the minimum requirements and is not satisfactory.

is fundamentally unsound

Indicates a basic weakness or instability that affects the entire structure.

FAQs

How can I use "is very weak" in a sentence?

You can use "is very weak" to describe something that lacks strength, effectiveness, or intensity. For instance, "The evidence presented in the case is very weak, making it difficult to reach a solid conclusion."

What can I say instead of "is very weak"?

Alternatives to "is very weak" include phrases like "is quite feeble", "is extremely fragile", or "is seriously flawed", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is very weak" or "is weak"?

Both "is weak" and "is very weak" are grammatically correct. However, "is very weak" intensifies the adjective, indicating a greater degree of weakness. The choice depends on the level of emphasis you want to convey.

What's the difference between "is weak" and "is very weak"?

"Is weak" simply states a lack of strength, while "is very weak" emphasizes a significant lack of strength. The addition of "very" amplifies the degree of weakness.