is very time

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is very time" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete thought or a fragment that lacks context to convey a clear meaning. Example: "This project is very time-consuming."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

41 human-written examples

"This 'Jackie from Abbots Bromley says' technique is very time consuming.

Independent

However, the retrieval is very time consuming.

Advances in Parallel Computing

However, the electrode design is very time consuming.

Computers & Industrial Engineering

Downloading it to local sites is very time consuming.

Computer Physics Communications

However, it is very time consuming for real-time applications.

Pattern Recognition Letters

Manual approach is very time consuming but accurate [5, 6].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

19 human-written examples

"Evaluation is very time-demanding and costly.

The New Yorker

"The game is very time-consuming," he said.

The New York Times

"Having to move people around to collect information is very time-consuming".

The New York Times

During two mornings of raids, it becomes clear her work is very time-consuming and frustrating.

The Guardian

Still, prefiltering is very time-consuming.

Parallel Computing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "is very time" as it is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use alternatives such as "is very time-consuming" or "takes a lot of time" to express the intended meaning clearly.

Common error

Do not truncate phrases ending with "is very" without completing the adjective. For example, instead of saying "This task is very time", complete the phrase as "This task is very time-consuming" or "This task requires a lot of time".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is very time" is grammatically incomplete, functioning as an incomplete predicate. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase lacks a necessary adjective to modify "time", making it nonsensical in standard English. The phrase by itself doesn't convey a complete thought or express a clear function.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is very time" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both written and spoken English. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is an incomplete phrase that requires an adjective to modify the noun "time". Instead, use more appropriate and grammatically correct alternatives such as ""is very time-consuming"", ""takes a lot of time"", or similar phrases to clearly and effectively express the intended meaning. Always ensure that your phrases are grammatically complete to avoid confusion and maintain clarity in communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is very time-consuming

Adds the adjective "consuming" to clearly indicate that something requires a significant amount of time.

takes a lot of time

Uses a common and straightforward expression to indicate that something requires a significant time investment.

is extremely time-intensive

Replaces "very" with "extremely" and uses the adjective "time-intensive" to emphasize the amount of time required.

requires a significant time commitment

Emphasizes the commitment of time needed for a task or activity.

is a lengthy process

Focuses on the duration of the process, highlighting that it takes a considerable amount of time.

devours a great deal of time

Uses a more figurative expression to describe the time consumption.

is a drawn-out affair

Highlights the prolonged and often tedious nature of the activity.

is a protracted endeavor

Uses more formal language to describe the extended duration of the effort.

is substantially time-demanding

Uses the adjective "time-demanding" to emphasize the amount of time required and employs "substantially" for emphasis.

occupies a considerable span of time

Indicates that the activity fills a notable duration.

FAQs

Why is "is very time" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "is very time" requires a completing adjective to make sense. Time itself is a noun, and "very" modifies adjectives or adverbs. A correct phrase would be "is very time-consuming" or "is very time-intensive".

What are some alternatives to "is very time" to describe a lengthy task?

Instead of "is very time", you could say "takes a lot of time", "is extremely time-consuming", or "requires a significant time commitment".

How can I use "time" correctly in a sentence describing the duration of an activity?

Use "time" with adjectives that indicate duration, such as "time-consuming", "time-intensive", or in phrases like "takes time". For example, "The project is time-consuming" or "The project takes a lot of time".

What is the difference between saying something is "time-consuming" versus "time-intensive"?

"Time-consuming" generally means that an activity requires a significant amount of time to complete. "Time-intensive" similarly implies that an activity requires a lot of time and effort concentrated into it. They are often interchangeable, but "time-intensive" might emphasize the focus required more than simple duration.