Kevin Sali, a criminal defense attorney in Portland, Oregon, who has followed the Syed case, noted that ineffective counsel claims are typically "very hard to win".
The result is that even when the basic idea is easy to understand, the code implementing lock-free algorithms is typically very subtle, hard to understand, and hard to get right.
(Arab black tea is typically very sweet).
Informal enterprises are typically very small.
The tweaks are typically very minor.
The MFM is typically a hard and a soft mask.
As a result, this wisdom is typically hard-won.
The story missions included "defense" puzzles that typically were considered very hard to solve; Barth recognized after release that players would stall out at these puzzles and not attempt to complete the game, with only 2% of the players tracked having reached the final puzzle.
Claims are typically the hardest part of the patent to understand because they are written in a very specific way (each claim is a single sentence).
Afterward, he was typically hard on himself.
