is threatened

USAGE SUMMARY

"is threatened" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It is a passive verb form, indicating that something or someone is in danger or at risk. Example: The endangered species of elephants is threatened by poaching and loss of habitat.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The kiwi is threatened.

The New Yorker

Their existence is threatened.

The New York Times - Sports

Today, that monopoly is threatened.

The New Yorker

Now this progress is threatened.

The Economist

Now all that is threatened.

The New York Times

"My identity is threatened.

The New York Times

Once again, the banking system is threatened.

The New York Times

IN AMERICA, a price war is threatened.

The Economist

More than just the Hudson is threatened.

The New York Times

Today, however, it is threatened with extinction.

The New York Times

"Democracy is threatened in Iraq," he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is threatened", ensure the subject clearly identifies what is at risk and the context specifies the source or nature of the threat. For example, "The ecosystem is threatened by deforestation."

Common error

Avoid using "is threatened" without a clearly defined subject. Saying "The future is threatened" is less impactful than "The future of the rainforest is threatened by unsustainable farming practices."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is threatened" functions as a passive verb construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence is the recipient of a threat or faces danger. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is threatened" is a commonly used phrase that functions as a passive verb construction to indicate that something is at risk or in danger. Ludwig AI confirms it as grammatically correct. Its neutral tone makes it suitable for diverse contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and encyclopedic writing. When using this phrase, clarity and specificity are key to ensure the subject and source of the threat are well-defined. While "is threatened" is a strong and versatile phrase, exploring alternatives such as "is in danger" or "is at risk" can add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is at risk

Employs a synonymous prepositional phrase, directly indicating a state of vulnerability.

is in danger

Uses a different prepositional phrase to express the same concept of being at risk.

is imperiled

Substitutes a more formal and less common verb to convey the sense of being endangered.

is jeopardized

Replaces "threatened" with a verb emphasizing the potential for loss or damage.

faces a threat

Replaces the passive voice with an active construction, focusing on the threat itself.

is endangered

Uses a more specific term, often applied to species facing extinction, to indicate severe threat.

is vulnerable

Highlights the susceptibility to harm or negative impact.

is unsafe

Focuses on the lack of security or protection from harm.

is compromised

Suggests that something's security or integrity is at risk

is under siege

Implies a state of being actively attacked or surrounded by threats.

FAQs

How can I use "is threatened" in a sentence?

Use "is threatened" to indicate that something is at risk or in danger. For instance, "The coral reef is threatened by pollution" or "The company's profits are threatened by increased competition".

What can I say instead of "is threatened"?

You can use alternatives like "is in danger", "is at risk", or "is endangered" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is threatened by" or "is threatening to"?

"Is threatened by" indicates that something is being put at risk. "Is threatening to" indicates that something is posing a risk to something else. For example, "The forest is threatened by the fire" versus "The fire is threatening to engulf the forest".

What's the difference between "is threatened" and "is vulnerable"?

"Is threatened" implies an active threat or danger is present. "Is vulnerable" suggests a susceptibility to harm, even without an immediate threat. Something that "is vulnerable" can easily "be threatened", but not necessarily.