Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
is substantial to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "is substantial to" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to convey importance or significance, but the correct expression would typically be "is substantial for" or "is substantial in." Example: "The funding is substantial for the success of the project."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Alternative expressions(20)
is valuable for
is important to
is instrumental to
has implications for
is consequential to
is commensurate to
is considerable for
is momentous to
is crucial to
is crucial for
is attendant to
is suitable to
is essential to
is important for
is relevant to
is robust to
is meaningful for
substantial in
is consistent to
is appropriate to
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
11 human-written examples
As those characters can include such larger-than-life individuals as Verdi's Falstaff, Puccini's villainous Scarpia in Tosca, Wagner's Dutchman, Wotan in the Ring cycle, or Hans Sachs in Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg, plus Stephen Sondheim's Sweeney Todd, the picture that reaches the audience is substantial to say the least.
News & Media
Therefore, it is substantial to optimize and accelerate its implementation.
Consequently, it is substantial to develop the right assistive robot or device for them.
Science
In addition choosing the appropriate programming method is substantial to gain the best performance.
Therefore, it is substantial to make sure those assistive medical robots embedded into older adults lives aim at benefiting elderly, and not embedded to diminish care burden on the other people [29].
Science
Philosophers who agree that trust can be rational regardless, perhaps, of whether it is "substantial" (to use McGeer's language)—tend to disagree about the extent to which reasons that confer rationality must be accessible to the trustor.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
48 human-written examples
The implications of this alternative are substantial, to say the least.
News & Media
It was therefore appropriate to require a health threat to be "substantial" to qualify for an exemption, the brief said.
News & Media
For those in the private sector who do, the rewards are substantial, to companies and their shareholders.
News & Media
This indicates that reproducibility and repeatability were substantial to almost perfect, respectively.
Trump: It may be small to some Forbes readers but could be substantial to someone struggling to make payments.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When intending to convey that something is large or significant in relation to something else, use the correct preposition. "Substantial for" or "substantial in" are often appropriate. For example, 'The evidence is "substantial for" a conviction' or 'The increase is "substantial in" size'.
Common error
Avoid using "to" after "substantial" when you mean "for" or "in". The phrase "is substantial to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Always double-check your preposition choice to ensure grammatical accuracy.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "is substantial to" is intended to function as a linking phrase, aiming to connect a subject with a quality of significance or importance. However, it's grammatically flawed and needs correction to convey its intended meaning effectively.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "is substantial to" is grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI explains, the correct usage typically involves using "substantial for" or "substantial in", depending on the intended meaning. Since there are no examples of correct usage in the provided data, it underscores the importance of avoiding this construction. To ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy, replace it with alternatives like "is significant for", "is important for", or other similar phrases as explained above.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is substantial for
Corrects the grammatical error by using the correct preposition "for".
is substantial in
Corrects the grammatical error by using the preposition "in", indicating a specific area where something is substantial.
is significant for
Replaces "substantial" with a synonym, maintaining the same core meaning and using the correct preposition.
is important for
Uses a more common synonym for "substantial", keeping the meaning similar and correcting the grammar.
is crucial for
Emphasizes the importance by using "crucial" instead of "substantial", while ensuring grammatical correctness.
is vital for
Similar to "crucial", highlights the necessity of something.
is essential for
Replaces "substantial" with "essential", indicating a fundamental requirement.
is considerable for
Uses "considerable" to express the magnitude or extent of something's impact.
is meaningful for
Shifts the focus to the impact or relevance of something.
is valuable for
Highlights the worth or benefit of something.
FAQs
How can I properly use the word "substantial" in a sentence?
The word "substantial" typically requires a preposition that correctly links it to the rest of the sentence. Common choices include "for" as in "The evidence is "substantial for" a conviction" or "in" as in "The increase is "substantial in" size".
What are some alternatives to "is substantial to" that I can use?
Instead of the grammatically incorrect "is substantial to", you can use phrases like "is significant for", "is important for", or "is essential for" depending on the context.
Is it ever correct to use the phrase "is substantial to"?
In standard written English, the phrase "is substantial to" is generally considered incorrect. The prepositions "for" or "in" are more appropriate depending on the intended meaning.
What's the difference between saying "is substantial for" and "is substantial in"?
"Is substantial for" indicates that something is significantly beneficial or contributes greatly to something else. "Is substantial in" indicates that something is large or significant within a specific area or aspect. For example, "The funding is "substantial for" the project's success", and "The increase is "substantial in" size".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested