is substantial enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is substantial enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something meets a certain level of significance or adequacy. Example: "The evidence presented in the report is substantial enough to support the claims made by the researchers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

He added, "It is substantial enough that it is worthy of real consideration".

The New York Times

The risotto is substantial enough to be the main course, without so much as a sliver of red meat.

The New York Times - Food

Both can be used to flavour food, but only Florence is substantial enough to be a meal in itself.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Greek Chicken and Tomato Salad: A tomato-centric Greek salad that is substantial enough for lunch or a light supper.

The New York Times

Cabbage, Onion and Millet Kugel: This savory kugel is substantial enough to serve as a main dish.

The New York Times

A good way in that Stafford's arm talent alone is substantial enough to defeat even well-executed defenses.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

Peaches are substantial enough to handle flame.

The Washington Post

None are substantial enough for turkey.

The New York Times - Food

Some analysts do not think the closings are substantial enough.

The New York Times

But they are substantial enough to generate profit.

The New York Times

In fact, many starters, at from $11 to $16, are substantial enough to be entrees.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is substantial enough" to convey that something meets a required threshold of size, amount, or importance. Ensure the context clarifies what standard is being met.

Common error

Avoid using "is substantial enough" redundantly when "is substantial" conveys the intended meaning. Overuse can dilute the impact of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is substantial enough" functions as a predicate adjective, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate it meets a certain threshold. Ludwig examples show its use in assessing whether something has sufficient impact or size.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

31%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is substantial enough" is a commonly used phrase that functions as a predicate adjective, indicating that something meets a necessary level or threshold. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and versatile, appearing frequently in News & Media, Science, and Academic contexts. When using this phrase, it's important to clearly define the benchmark being met to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives such as "is adequate enough" and "is significant enough" can be used, "is substantial enough" effectively conveys the idea of meeting a specific requirement or standard.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is adequate enough

Replaces "substantial" with "adequate", suggesting the minimum requirement is met.

is sufficient enough

Substitutes "substantial" with "sufficient", indicating enough to meet a need or purpose.

is considerable enough

Emphasizes the size or amount is large enough to be important.

is significant enough

Highlights the importance or impact of something being adequate.

is large enough

Focuses on the size or quantity being sufficient.

is big enough

A more informal way to express that something is large or important enough.

is ample enough

Indicates there is more than enough of something.

is appreciable enough

Highlights that the amount or degree is noticeable or measurable.

is passable enough

Suggests that something barely meets the required standard.

is viable enough

Indicates that something is practical and able to succeed.

FAQs

How to use "is substantial enough" in a sentence?

The phrase "is substantial enough" indicates that something meets a necessary level or threshold. For example, "The evidence presented /s/is+substantial+enough to warrant further investigation".

What can I say instead of "is substantial enough"?

You can use alternatives like "is adequate enough", "is sufficient enough", or "is considerable enough" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "substantial enough"?

Yes, the phrase "substantial enough" is grammatically sound and commonly used to indicate that something meets a certain level of significance or adequacy. For instance, "The proposed changes /s/are+substantial+enough to improve efficiency".

What is the difference between "is substantial" and "is substantial enough"?

"Is substantial" simply states that something is significant or considerable. "Is substantial enough" implies that it meets a specific requirement or standard. For example, a donation /s/is+substantial but might not /s/be+substantial+enough to fund the entire project.